2007-09-29 08:40:25 · 25 answers · asked by Anonymous in Sports ➔ Cricket
http://khanprod.com/
2007-09-29 08:44:31 · update #1
your absolutely correct, india would have had to face a big defeat if it was'nt for the rain.
2007-09-29 08:44:29 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 1⤋
This is the second time rain is saving India. First was in the Natwest test when England was just one wicket away from victory.
Australia played exceptionally well and they would surely have won because India lost one wicket and the first over by Brett Lee was a maiden.
I think rain deprived Australia of a well deserved victory.
2007-09-29 23:36:35 · answer #2 · answered by poison ivy 606 4 · 3⤊ 0⤋
i think the rain saved India as misbaul haq had saved India from a big defeat.(but don't u worry India will surely loose the next match.b'cause India can't live without loosing.)
2007-09-30 22:03:17 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Not at all Indians have good ideas.They have sent Irfan Pathan because he is just like a night batsmen because he it is already raining and the play would`nt be possible if at all it will possible then they would strat the play.If Pathan scores some attacking 40 or 50 runs.It will give some foundation to the Indian team and there would`nt be more pressureon Indian team as batsmen like Yuvraj,Dravid will take over.
2007-09-29 16:08:05 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
While 307 runs is a big score to chase especially against a strong team likke Australia, one must remember that cricket is a game of uncertainties and anything can happen. Further india have chased the score in excess of 300 runs in ODI in the past.
2007-10-01 00:35:40 · answer #5 · answered by vakayil k 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
the main appropriate actuality is incorrect way around, i.e. rain saved Bangladesh from yet another humiliating defeat as having published 384 runs for the shortcoming of 6 wickets, India does not hnave nost the tournament under any circumstances and that that they had each danger to win the tournament if the rain did not interrupt the play.
2016-12-17 13:01:30 · answer #6 · answered by trickey 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
completely agreed!!!!! india was saved by the rain otherwise india would've faced a shameful defeat. thank god it rained. let's hope the second odi's are not like this one hopefully india would do well in tht one
2007-09-29 10:00:26 · answer #7 · answered by indianbeauty 3 · 3⤊ 0⤋
I think u are some wat right coz if there wud have been play after tht then India might hav a chance coz they needed 165 in 20 overs and they r the champions of the twenty twenty format soo.... but Ya rain saved India...
2007-09-30 07:29:50 · answer #8 · answered by RISHI 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
yes...rain saved india's big defeat in the hands of gr8 champs
2007-09-29 23:43:36 · answer #9 · answered by taha 1 · 1⤊ 0⤋
after just 2and half overs it is very difficult to say because cricket is full of surprises and the way india is playing now a days they can also having the potential to turn the table also.
But one thing was right that target was quite tough.
2007-09-29 20:10:00 · answer #10 · answered by manish t 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋