With the older generation getting closer to retirement, and social security already insolvent,
and children who are poor already getting healthcare through states Medicaid. Where does B*tch Clinton think we are gonna get money to give every birth child 5,000?
and did she ever consider that all the illegal Mexicans that give birth will be eligiable for this New Welfare?
2007-09-29 06:25:22 · 16 answers · asked by Rada S 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
What's up is pretty obvious. Just another leftist dedicated to creating the maximum amount of dependency upon Big Brother, thereby creating more welfare, more food stamps, more giveaway programs more "free" stuff which, of course, taxpayers actually do have to pay for, with the ultimate goal being the ever increasing power of the left. Nothing complicated. Just the standard left wing desire to turn the greatest nation in history into a socialist, nanny state.
2007-09-29 06:42:18 · answer #1 · answered by bucksbowlbound 3 · 2⤊ 1⤋
it rather isn't any longer something... I already pay 20% of my wages (sure, which incorporates the tax harm) in basic terms for expenditures on my team coverage. Then, think related to the co-will pay, deductable, and co-coverage I pay, and it rather is properly over 30%! 15% appears like a dream to me... deliver it on! heavily, do the fighters of socialized... errr... time-honored (does it rather count quantity what it rather is called?) rather think of that we are able to pay extra as a share of earnings than we who've coverage do now? Get genuine individuals... there is yet one extra reason you do no longer want Obama or Clinton for prez, and it has no longer something to do with healthcare... good ol' boys.
2016-12-28 07:10:35 · answer #2 · answered by pafel 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Make a promise, get a vote. Don' t worry about affording it. You can then get it on the house floor, have them vote it down and say "Oh my, I tried. I love the poor people. Those mean old senators hate you." And so it goes, election after election. Anyone who takes politicians ideas seriously, is not capable of casting an intelligent vote anyway.
Don't worry it is just rhetoric.
2007-09-29 06:54:08 · answer #3 · answered by Jim H 3 · 2⤊ 1⤋
My favorite is that all these people stuck on welfare are going to continue reproducing like rabbits so they can get the most money for their family. Hilary is going to bankrupt the U.S. faster than any president in history.
2007-09-29 08:03:11 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Take a breather! God! Election campaigns are supposed to be times for new ideas, new proposals. Knee jerk negative parsing of any proposal made by any of the opposition is completely pointless. I'm not saying that the plan is a good one or not but I certainly wouldn't dismiss it out of hand if it was one of the republicans who proposed it. I would want to see the details. For example maybe, just maybe, in your rush to call Clinton names you have overlooked a provision to limit the money to citizens and legal residents.
2007-09-29 06:49:09 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 2⤋
Well, it's an idea in the initial stages, so you don't need to get all worked up over it. You could simply make it so that at least one of the parents is required to be an American Citizen, not too difficult. It's sort of in line with the private accounts concept that neocons like when it comes to Social Security. It's not really that expensive, considering our country's relatively low birthrate, it's about as much in one year, as it costs for a month for the war in Iraq.
2007-09-29 06:32:10 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 3⤋
It's another way for Hillary to get into our wallets. You're right - what about all the baby boomers coming onto retirement that have been paying for all these horrible plans Congress cooks up?
She's just another horrible socialist that will propose something but not mention how it will be paid for.
2007-09-29 06:40:04 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 1⤋
She will never get it done. It is a savings account at best, and you need a job and money of your own to make this work. She is trying to tell us what to do with our money. Lets see if she will foot the bill for the groceries first. I am voting for Obama, lets just cut to the chase. Hey!
2007-09-29 07:01:12 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
Don't get your knickers in a twist yet. It is not yet a proposal, not even a plan. By Clinton's words, it is an interesting idea.
By the way, it was first talked about by Time Magazine three months ago.
2007-09-29 06:55:34 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
Maybe if some of you people (including the Q asker) really listened to what the candidates (including Clinton) are saying, you would know what you were talking about instead of sounding like complete morons.
2007-09-29 07:10:28 · answer #10 · answered by The Wiz 7 · 0⤊ 2⤋