English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

These things have been confusing me for years.

1. How is it that if an adult attacks an adult, it's considered "physical assault", but when a kid attacks a kid, it's considered "bullying"?

2. How is it that when a bunch of high school kids tape a freshman to a goalpost in his underwear, it's "hazing", but when adults do the exact same thing, it's "sexual assault"?

3. How is it that, even though minors have almost no constitutional rights, they can still be tried in adult court?

2007-09-29 06:07:58 · 3 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Law & Ethics

3 answers

1. It can actually be called physical assault; people like to brush things under the rug when it involves kids;

2. Again, same thing. People like to brush things under the rug when it involves kids;

3. Minors have constitutional rights.

2007-09-29 15:44:16 · answer #1 · answered by Princess Leia 7 · 0 0

The first two I guess they expect as adults they learned as a child the second I guess if you do something wrong it doesnt matter how many rights you have or dont have.

2007-09-29 16:44:12 · answer #2 · answered by donielle 7 · 0 0

because people are stupid and men are scared and being raised by women who cant teach them what it means to stand and fight to the death the goverment doesnt want us to be incapacitated cuz we cant pay taxes if we are messed up

2007-09-29 06:23:09 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers