Hillary is quacking like a socialist (again), why can't liberals say the "S" word?

Question

To a liberal, giving every child born on USA soil (this includes illegal parents) $5000, sounds like a great way to start a new life. The flaw, to those who don't choose to drink Hillary's Kool Aid, is where is this $5000 coming from? Of course it's tax-payers.

If this isn't a clear case of re-distribution of wealth and Euro-Trash socialism, then Bill Clinton is not an adulterer.

Clearly, this is socialism but liberals who support Hillary's socialist plan, can't come out of the closet and admit they are socialists?

(yes, I already know anyone who diasagrees with socialism must be- neo-con, stupid, fascist, racist, capitalist, etc because if you oppose socialism you MUST be all of these things)

Bert is a classic liberal- he see nothing wrong with government confiscating people's earnings, to redistribute that wealth, to someone who hasn't earned it... because govt spends money on something else (just fill in the blank), you are guilty of supporting whatever that may be, because you don't agree to re-distribute wealth. What a perfect example of liberalism- thanks Bert, you proved my point.

Answer 1

They won't admit they're socialist, because people, including themselves, know that socialism has never worked and it never will. Also alot of people know, including themselves, that Communists have said that socialism is the stepping stone to Communism, but liberals think that they can control it. That they won't allow Communism, but then again, I believe there are some liberals who are Communists, now I don't think Hillary is a Communist, but socialism always leads to Communism, and there is no getting around that, that's my point.

Answer 2

Hey! don't call "Euro-Trash" to europeans!! They are not ALL socialists!!

About the subject: I think to give $ 5000 to every child born is wrong. Because on this way many people would adopt a child just to get the $ 5000 and then will abandon him/her. I know a case in a country where a guy did that: got the child to get the money, and he didn't love him, and hit him a lot (the child had marks in his back).

Hillary is saying that to catch the poor vote. If she spent that money in better EDUCATION, USA will fix many problems in the future. Or she could invest that money in jobs to people who want to have a kid. So they will earn much more than u$s 5000 working.

There was many things which made America the GREATEST. One of them was its long term policy: in the past, when some president made something, it was thought for the future. But the earliest presidents just think in today!! they don't see the future!! that's wrong!! America is losing its soul!! Look China: now THEY are doing what made America the Greatest, and they are growing very fast.

If USA keeps going with its current SHORT term policy, and China with the LONG term policy, in some years China will be the greatest :( a comunist country.

I hope this woman loses the elections.

Answer 3

I think there are definitely elements of socialism in liberalism and the Democratic party, and they are there for a reason. I live in Europe, and there are some big advantages to the system they have here (why do you think they have been kicking our a*s economically for the past 6 years?)
Also, they have affordable health care, houses you can actually buy, far lower rates of crime, LESS frivilous lawsuits, less out-of-control corporate salaries and a safety net if you get badly injured or something else happens to you.
So, anybody who thinks socialism is the worst thing that can ever happen, think again! Besides, what do you think "social security" and "public education" are? (Communist plots that both need to be eliminated ASAP according to the true wishes of Republican billionaires).
PS: FYI, socialism has nothing to do with communism, so don't even trot out that old horse.

Answer 4

Now if we could just have the word "socialist" back from the regulatory-statists and the word "libertarian" back from you liberals... ;-) I'm an anarchist. I'm used to people misusing all these words.

Answer 5

Liberals can not come out and admit that they are socialists they would loose the support of people who's only knowledge of politics is what the media gives them. it would also expose them to the kind of scrutiny and attention they do not want.
better that they and their cohorts in the liberal media focus every ones attention on the far right wing and neo-cons, make Conservatives the enemy so that they can work their dirty deeds in relative secret

Answer 6

Okay. Good point. But what about the child credits Bush enacted? What's the difference? Those tax credits have to be made up somewhere else by taxpayers, am I right?

I will say though that on the surface it looks like she's attempting to buy votes. Sorta like the $300 I got back from Bush a few years ago...except bigger.

Answer 7

Its retarded plan. Besides the 5000 won't be worth anything by the time they are 18

Answer 8

Liberals don't have to say their socialist, just look at their Che Guevara shirts and socialist flags they wave at protests.

Answer 9

Socialism and communism are links in the same chain.... but the liberal attempts to make it palatable with words like "progressive" and "enlightened" or "equality" in reality, we would all be equal, equally poor that is...

Answer 10

The only part of your post I disagree with is (again). I think you should change that to (still). Wasn't it fortuitous that the Yankees lost last night so now Hillary won't have to take both sides of the World Series?