Hello, I have an Old Moors Almanac dated 2057ad this will bring a conclusion to the Big Question. Quote, a tribe living in a remote part of Canada called Nekcihc who spent their entire lives supplying fish to Tesco's. are you sitting comfortable the story begins once upon a time a lone fisherman in his boat hauling in his nets noticed a fish standing up shaking itself and before his very eyes it's scales started to turn to feathers the gills into wings and from its body dropped not one but two white balls picking them up he placed in his pocket and quickly returned to shore,then he felt in his pocket for the balls(keep it clean!) but pulled out two creatures similar to the one now running along the beach he must of incubated them in his pocket. So the fiscken came first the eggs incubated by man, Unquote) The fiscken took the tribes name. Their father was a flying fish
2007-09-27 21:07:31
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
HA!! LOOK HERE!!!!
>I have the answer <
:D
Some biologists do believe the egg actually came first before the chicken and this is the reason why: Through evolutionary processes, a single species goes through thousands of transmutations. The prehistoric ancestors of the chicken would have done exactly the same thing, one day one of these Neanderthal-chickens laid an egg, and from this egg hatched a mutated chick known today as a chicken.
So to answer your question "How were they incubated?"
-By the Neanderthal-chicken!
2007-10-04 00:36:24
·
answer #2
·
answered by Raven 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
The egg came around a long time before there were chickens, unless of course, you mean a chicken's egg. In that case, the NEAR-chicken had a mutation and laid a REAL chicken's egg, so the egg is still first.
and of course it got incubated by it's mommy, even though it's mommy wasn't quite a chicken.
2007-10-06 00:35:50
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Scientists have created a frog with transparent skin in order to view the organs as they work. The chicken was accidentally created of two different species that were not chickens, but which created chickens. The hen, whatever her species, incubated it. The egg came first.
2007-10-03 23:36:14
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
in the beginning God created the heaven and the earth, the foul of the air and the fish of the sea. God created man and woman to rule over that which He created. hence, i conclude that chicken came first.
even if we logically think, without any mating...it ain't possible for the egg to form in the first place. so there is no question of eggs incubating on their own or by any other means. i am sorry i can't answer this question in a jovial vein.
2007-09-28 03:46:36
·
answer #5
·
answered by Chief of sinners 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
This question has been asked over and over and I have never answered it till today ---and hear ye hear ye God just told me He /She made the two chickens first a male and a female and they tossed a coin who incubates the egg first ---and in their arguments of me first me first God beat them by putting an egg under the female chicken and therefore in my opinion the egg came second --hope now the whole world is satisfied with this answer from God finally solved ...n.
2007-09-28 03:30:17
·
answer #6
·
answered by Nosh 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
The chicken because the chicken had to Lay the Egg. As far as the Chicken God created the Chicken so the Chicken came from God and the Egg from the Chicken.
2007-10-05 17:23:47
·
answer #7
·
answered by Lightbright 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
If it came first, but it didn't, the chicken came first. I wrote in answers a long time ago that GOD made man, then children came from them. So there is no problem with incubation as hens were made the same way. He made man and all the beasts and the birds and everything that there is.
2007-09-28 03:25:21
·
answer #8
·
answered by letitbe 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
hehehe. an egg is merely a potency, in short, BECOMING. while chicken is actually "already" BEING. an action is needed for the BECOMING to become BEING. while BEING in its full essence doesnt need an action to become being because it is already in a being state. now, to think that the egg comes first where there is no means to incubate it merely affirms that the chicken comes first. can you think of an egg incubating a chicken? u cant reverse the cycle to prove otherwise. back to your question, well, given the case, yours might be immaterial.
2007-10-05 22:43:22
·
answer #9
·
answered by shzar1010 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
the matter is the "kind" of egg...
all an egg needs to be incubated is heat, a warm "nest"...
to understand the beginning, you can think of the egg as a metaphor...
the chicken (us), always come after the "egg", and we are "incubated" in the warm mom's womb...
now, who was the first "mother", who was the first "father"?
"who" was the first "egg"?
2007-09-28 03:32:58
·
answer #10
·
answered by JESUS C 2
·
0⤊
0⤋