English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Does anyone else notice that liberals find a way to gripe about everything no matter what decision is made.

Here is my example of what I am talking about.

On here you will see liberals bashing bush for not acting on a CIA intel memo that was written prior to 9/11 that stated an attack was going to happen. Now this memo was written by intel agents.

Then you will see liberals on here that bash bush for acting on intel reports from the same CIA that gave him reports that Saddam had WMD's and that they were a real threat to America.

My question is how do they fualt him saying he should have took the intel memo at face value on one occasion then fault him later for doing exactly what they said he should have done the 1st time.

I say make up your minds should he have trust in the intel or not. Of course when he did trust the intel they said he lied.

2007-09-27 19:00:50 · 1 answers · asked by Anonymous in News & Events Current Events

1 answers

This liberal knows that 9/11 was an inside job and that puts a different light on your question.

This liberal doesn't bother bashing Bush because this liberal knows the Hillary is just one of the establishment and would act just the same if she were in office.

The only difference between Hillary and Bush is a little packaging and spin and maybe some lip service to humanitarian causes.

2007-09-27 20:59:30 · answer #1 · answered by Skeptic 7 · 1 1

fedest.com, questions and answers