English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Why is it only America that is interested in Iran and iraq and not the rest of the world the UK people Arnt interested ether only tony Blair why is this what dose the UN say on the matter if the UN where interested why not all the united Nations ie the rest the EU why did we go in to iraq when there where no WOMD why do the american people support an illegal war is it because its the only industry making real money

2007-09-27 17:27:54 · 22 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

22 answers

Which question would you like answered first?

The U.N. didn't care when a million Rwandans were murdered, and they don't seem to care about Darfur, either. Why should they care that Iran is the top supplier for international terrorism? Someone has to stop them from pulling off another 9/11, and it's not going to be France.

2007-09-27 17:31:13 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2 2

Your question is flawed in too many places to answer it honestly.

First off we are not the only country interested in Iran. Basically ALL of the heavy hitters in the EU are interested.

Tony Blair is no longer the prime minister. The new PM is Gordon Brown.

Finally, it's called WMD not WOMD. Also there is nothing illegal about this war. Anyone who told you that is an idiot.

2007-09-28 01:14:46 · answer #2 · answered by - 6 · 0 0

Meanwhile.. France stated it was preparing for war, Germany warns that steps must be taken to prevent Iran from developing nukes.. and the EU is going to impose it's own sanctions without waiting for the UN to go through months of pointless bickering about it.

And FYI, nobody with any authority on the matter has declared the "Iraq War" illegal. In fact no such body has even accepted a case, because the argument is so weak.

But hey.. thanks for playing. Next time do some research into the topic before making yourself look the fool.

2007-09-28 00:39:43 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 4 1

Oh now lets hurry on the bandwagon and start bashing the country that is PROBABLY OWED MONEY by every nation on EARTH-lets make sure we blame every single man, woman and child for everything that is going wrong with the world ---and when it DOES go wrong---who ya gona call to come help fix it---of course---THE GOOD OLD USA!!!! What I want to know is this----WW1---USA was there to help NOT OUR WAR. WW2, NOT OUR WAR but we got bombed (PEARL HARBOR) and we helped save MOST of Europe... Sunami in Indonesia? USA troops and volunteers rush to aid... Earthquakes in Japan and other parts of the world---USA sends aid.... Africa and underdeveloped poorer third world countries---all receive aid from the United States... but, where was ANY COUNTRY when 9/11 happened or when Katrina destroyed New Orleans or when the earthquake at Northridge California happened... Not ONE foreign country came to the aid of the USA EXCEPT Mr. Tony Blair from England.....so you all go right ahead and keep on bashing the land where I live---but the next time you have a natural disaster in YOUR country, how would you make it through without the AID of the citizens of the USA that have come through for you ALL at ever turn....????

I am not a BUSH supporter and I do not defend SOME of the things he has done since becoming president, but I WILL defend our country from biggots who can't wait to rip us apart verbally but would be the FIRST IN LINE to take our aid if and when it is needed.

2007-09-28 00:49:38 · answer #4 · answered by LittleBarb 7 · 2 1

It's the oil. Seriously, it's about control of the region's oil and the American empire. It's ironic to hear the lying Petraeus complain about Iran sending over people with weapons to iraq when in fact it is Saudi Arabia who is funding over 90% of the suicide bombers to go to iraq and blow themselves up. why do people still believe this administration?

2007-09-28 01:35:42 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

the UNITED NATIONS inspection team were denied full access by the iraqi government as they had agreed to in the treaty they signed after desert storm. this sent a signal and most nations in the UNITED NATIONS thought iraq was hiding weopens of mass destruction. it was in the best interest of the world that the UNITED STATES attack iraq. at first most nations in the UNITED NATIONS were for the attack. alot of people believe that weopens were sent to syria before the attack.

2007-09-28 00:58:14 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

France has been hitting hard on Iran, said at the UN that a nuclear Iran is intolerable.

France!

2007-09-28 00:41:26 · answer #7 · answered by ? 6 · 2 0

Are you insane? The UK is interested in Iran, France is interested in Iran, Canada interested in Iran... the list goes on.

2007-09-28 00:42:14 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

The old wounds cut the deepest.

The US is looking to avenge 1979 and control Junior Saudi Arabia. There are lots of Halliburton and weapons sales to be made there.

2007-09-28 01:01:32 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

You have made many false assumptions and assertions here. One glaring one is that you assume Americans and the United States government are in complete agreement on this matter. If you can disagree with Tony Blair, why can't I disagree with George Bush? You are presumptuous to say the least.

2007-09-28 00:34:27 · answer #10 · answered by 8of2kinds 6 · 2 3

fedest.com, questions and answers