shouldnt they be considered human. and protected as such
2007-09-27 17:05:46 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Other - Society & Culture
Correct data, faulty analysis.
The lesson you should be drawing is the huge, repeat H-U-G-E, real world difference a relatively small genetic difference can make.
Side-by-side comparisons of the two species demonstrate conclusively that both intelligence and impulse control are genetically determined....
Nimadan
2007-09-27 17:24:56 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Chimpanzees are actually not ninety 8% human, yet ninety 8% of the DNA base pairs are an identical to describe: this 2% is unlike in case you had 2 maps and a small area of one grow to be distinctive. the two% that differs between chimpanzees and human beings includes small yet mandatory modifications in numerous genes, plus significant transformations in "regulator" genes which administration, to illustrate, how a lot and in what way neurons in the concepts kind. those modifications are area of what separates us bodily and mentally from all different primates. ----as much as date---- to superb above, it is approximately 60% it incredibly is shared with the banana, it incredibly is mandatory DNA existence has to make cells function
2016-10-20 04:54:34 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No.
Why, you may ask.
The hydrogen peroxide disinfectant you buy at the drug store is 98% water. Drink a few bottles of it and you'll know.
2007-09-27 17:20:45 · answer #3 · answered by sgtcosgrove 7 · 3⤊ 0⤋
wait a minute i thought they are in the world red book?
2007-09-27 17:21:11 · answer #4 · answered by steven25t 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
you don't know what your talking about,but they are protected to an extent
2007-09-27 17:15:27 · answer #5 · answered by Arthurlikesbeer 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋