this guy has an ERA of like 5.00, and he is the save leader. he must have blown a lot of saves or got a lot of run support atleast.
2007-09-27 15:45:20 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous in Sports ➔ Baseball
You're the only person in the history of baseball to question whether a league's saves' leader is a legit closer or not.
First year watching baseball?
To answer your question - OBVIOUSLY he's a legit closer, like I said earlier, he's the A.L. saves leader.
Get a clue.
.
2007-09-27 18:55:27 · answer #1 · answered by Kris 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
When he has blown saves he has flamed miserably, that is why his ERA is near the end of the galaxy. When looking for a weak link in Cleveland's playoff run, JoeBo is it. And Wedge has not been one to let his starters notch complete games, so Borowski's arm just may decide the opening round versus the Yankees.
2007-09-27 23:33:15 · answer #2 · answered by Zombie Birdhouse 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
He's had a lot of three run leads, and he's given up most of his runs in those games, rather than the games where he had a one run lead. He's also had three horrible games where he gave up 4, 4 and 6 runs. It's tricky to judge a short reliever by his ERA, because one or two bad games like those ones can destroy an ERA for a whole season if you only pitch 60 innings.
2007-09-28 12:42:27 · answer #3 · answered by Thomas M 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You are a fcking moron. Borowski is a terrific closer. He has HUGE nuts. He's had them since he was with the Cubs. You are a moron and you know jack sh*t about baseball. Go to sleep, you moron.
P.S. I'm not an Indian fan either, sport.
2007-09-27 23:52:21 · answer #4 · answered by ZBONE 1 · 1⤊ 0⤋
It is pretty ridiculous. He's actually been pretty good in save situations and just gotten killed in non-save situations.
2007-09-27 23:06:54 · answer #5 · answered by pfelon 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
He wasn't when he was with the Cubs
2007-09-28 00:13:08 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋