Both good names. Go well together. Easy to spell and pronounce. Good for a child and an adult. Good choice.
2007-09-27 15:59:07
·
answer #1
·
answered by Alex 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
My name was originally Rachael Nicole, but I changed it to Peyton-Nicole because Rachael is far too common where I come from (New Zealand) and Peyton is a name no one really hears over here. :) but yes it is a nice name
2014-03-12 18:50:02
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Rachael is very sweet, and I also like the simpler Rachel spelling (though either is fine), but I'm not into the 70s filler middle name Nicole, unless it has some special significance to you.
2007-09-27 22:27:37
·
answer #3
·
answered by Irish Mommy 6
·
0⤊
2⤋
Sounds good to me, and I like that you are using the traditional spelling of Rachael!!
2007-09-27 22:04:06
·
answer #4
·
answered by Reba 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
It is a lovely name!!!!
Racheal is beautiful and timeless... it means little lamb.. cant you just imagine your daughter sitting there with pigtails and a little stuffed lamb in her arms! :) lovely
Nicole is pretty. I love it... it is classic. It means victory of the people and I think it makes for a strong but feminine name!
Good choice... the Ls the Ns the Es all tie it together really well.
good luck with your perfect little name!
2007-09-27 22:01:47
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
Yes! Finally a decent name. I am so tired of hearing the trendy names like "Jaelyn"...."Jaylen"
2007-09-27 21:55:00
·
answer #6
·
answered by Bella ♥ Italiana 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
love it but spell nicole like this nichole it goes with raCHeal
2007-10-01 19:46:25
·
answer #7
·
answered by Sharon P 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
FINALLY - a name I like in "Baby Names"
2007-09-27 21:48:15
·
answer #8
·
answered by ♥♣♥ 4
·
2⤊
0⤋
Wow,that is a great name! Love it!
2007-09-27 21:39:14
·
answer #9
·
answered by Victorian Rose♥ 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
No, no, it's HORRIBLE! I much prefer "Raey'chelle Knickoal S'weaknee!"
kidding... it's lovely.
2007-09-27 21:50:47
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋