Now that would be worth a watch!
2007-09-27 09:50:51
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
5⤊
0⤋
No, Bush wont put his life on the line he prefers to do that with better men's blood.
Little coward had Daddy sort it for him once before you seriously don't think he'd even consider doing anything that required real guts now?
Ah my dinner jacket at least showed some character taking questions from an open floor at a university.Never in a million years would, or indeed could, Bush pull it off.
2007-09-27 17:20:17
·
answer #2
·
answered by Misty Blue 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
That is a tremendous idea! The only problem is Bush will be under the full umbrella and cape of the entire U.S. troops in Iraq, and would present a very unique target for the insurgents and or al-Qaeda. No way Bush will take any chance even if it would earn him a purple heart.
2007-09-27 17:03:24
·
answer #3
·
answered by !truth! 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
I would love to see that.
It is a shame that Blair has been replaced by Brown however, because I would love to see the both of them go outside the green zone.
Believe me, as much as it sounds stupid, if he actually did, it would do a lot towards his credibility. Same goes for British Prime Minister.
Whilst I realise that it would be unrealistic, and would be a total security nightmare for the security services protecting such a high profile figure, I would certainly have more respect for him if only he had the 'BALLS' to do it.
2007-09-27 17:23:57
·
answer #4
·
answered by Vlad 5
·
2⤊
0⤋
Boy do you hate President Bush THAT much!
No, I don't think it would do any good for him to go walkies in Baghdad. Some puny terrorist wanna-be can soar to stellar greatness by just happening to be in the right place at the right time to kill him, or at least make the attempt and scare him. Even that would be an accomplishment.
Bush is history, we just have to wait him out (and boy is that getting hard to do). He hasn't done anything that he can be impeached for and probably won't. So assassination would be the only way to get rid of him, but I don't think that it would do our image any good for that to happen. It certainly wouldn't do the Secret Service's image any good, and as they say "it would only embolden the terrorists."
2007-09-27 16:55:07
·
answer #5
·
answered by Dan S 7
·
2⤊
1⤋
I just find it amazing that neither he nor Blair have actually completed a tour of duty out there yet, given their "total commitment to the war on terror".
Perhaps it's just that they're too busy at present - or too easy with other people's lives!!
2007-09-28 08:46:28
·
answer #6
·
answered by one shot 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
Yep take Blair with him as well no security and no weapons.
Just a camera crew so we can watch the 2 war criminals get their come uppence on TV.
2007-09-28 10:01:43
·
answer #7
·
answered by Doodle 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
I don't think he's ever done a walkabout in California, New York, or Massachusetts to meet civilians.
2007-09-27 16:53:21
·
answer #8
·
answered by wyldfyr 7
·
6⤊
1⤋
hahahahahaha, joking aren't you? Bush, do a walk about in Baghdad.....hehehhehe. That would be like asking him to give a million dollars to each of his countrymen....tax free.
2007-09-27 16:52:21
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
I don't think that the Secret Service would allow it, that's a very dangerous area. He has never even been able to announce his visits beforehand they're always secret and show up a day later on the news that's how dangerous it is.
2007-09-27 16:52:02
·
answer #10
·
answered by secretservice 5
·
0⤊
3⤋
Ha, ha, ha....lol.. he would probably give them a speech and tell them to be greener and help the fight against global warming as well.
2007-09-27 18:03:40
·
answer #11
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋