By psychometrically valid tests (Wechsler) about 142.
Note that very recently valid test have been expanded to go up to 155. Before that they only went to 150. Higher score than that cannot be realistically validated scientifically. Test that give really high result are invented by high-IQ social clubs like Mensa or profit-seeking web-sites to make their members or customers feel good.
Also, "Emotional IQ" is also important, and no good test for creativity has ever been developed. Someone with a high IQ may not have the ingenuity to stand out, while someone with an average IQ may be be a true genius. Even a genius *with* a high IQ could be a looser in life.
2007-09-27 13:27:48
·
answer #1
·
answered by Mr. Niceguy 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
130-140 range
every test result varies a little.
also, IQs mean very little without emotional wisdom and experience.
2007-09-27 16:16:46
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
141
2007-09-27 16:12:52
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
IQ is not what matters when summing up somebody's intelligence. It measures your ability to learn, how smart you could be, not how smart you are.
144 last time I had it tested.
2007-09-27 16:15:50
·
answer #4
·
answered by dark is rising 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Mines 149
Thats right Wolfie - foxes win again
ADD: Yes Wolfie, time to once again bow down to your Vulpine masters..
2007-09-27 16:15:38
·
answer #5
·
answered by Mr. Fox 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Believe it or not (for those of you familiar with my questions), it's 148 last time I had it tested.
ADD
So the feudal war between the Wolves and the Foxes rises once more..........??
2007-09-27 16:13:24
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
128 when i Graduated in 1982
tested in Leavenworth!
2007-09-27 16:16:19
·
answer #7
·
answered by Forsaken1 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
less than 100
2007-09-27 16:14:27
·
answer #8
·
answered by 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
I don't know but I can't imagine it's that high being on here all the time and all.
2007-09-27 16:14:17
·
answer #9
·
answered by ShrunkenFro™ 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Higher than some, not as high as others.
2007-09-27 16:13:54
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋