There's no punch line. It's a question.
2007-09-27 05:51:05 · 17 answers · asked by Angelique 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Government
If you bothered to look up the definition and history of liberalism--easy to do if you've got a computer--you would discover that the principals of classical liberalism support capitalism and the creation of wealth. Liberalism is not socialism; for one thing, it requires taxation of the wealthy.
Nazism, according to Wikipedia "consisted of a loose collection of positions focused on those held to blame for Germany's defeat and weakness: anti-parliamentarism, ethnic nationalism, racism, collectivism,[7] eugenics, antisemitism (and) opposition to economic and political liberalism,[8]"
Bush's policies are not identical to Nazism but they have several obvious parallels, including the attacks on illegal immigrants, who are our new scapegoats.
After World War Two, any American high school kid knew exactly what propaganda was. Unfortunately, we seem to have forgotten.
Now, "education" consists of inculcating knee-jerk reactions to certain words, such as conservative, liberal, feminist.
2007-09-27 06:14:00 · update #1
I don't need to look it up, since I've studied the history of the Third Reich in some depth, for the past year.
I strongly recommend The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich, by William L. Shirer.
2007-09-27 06:17:15 · update #2
The Nazi wears a swastika. Bush supporters hide behind the flag.
2007-09-27 05:54:30 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 6⤊ 5⤋
neo nazi's listen to slayer and shave there heads,,,,
bush supporters listen to toby keith and solicit homosexual encounters in public restrooms
neo nazi's wear black boots with white laces
bush supporters drive mini vans and have fred 08 stickers on the bumber
neo nazi's have the most powerful gang in prison
bush supporters join the arian nation until bush grants them amnesty days before the next inaugeration
2007-09-27 06:03:47 · answer #2 · answered by rockabillly motha****** 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
One supports George Bush and the other is a Neo-Nazi, that was an easy question.
2007-09-27 05:53:57 · answer #3 · answered by Big Dave 4 · 4⤊ 1⤋
Neo-nazi's didn't support killing for oil. However, americans who support bush, do support killing for oil. Every man and woman bush ordered into Iraq and was killed, died because of bush wanting the Iraq oil.
First we went into iraq for WMD (Iraq apparently moved it all out in time, and our satelite view of the country somehow missed the big convoy of WMD leaving)
Then we went into Iraq to rid the world of evil in Iraq(saddam was apparently the only evil in iraq at the time)
Now we are in iraq to stop al qaeda (Because even though they weren't there in the beginning, they easily made it into iraq when we stopped going after them, to declare war on iraq.)
Osama- who killed thousands of americans in the WTC, is still alive, and Iraq is our #1 priority. Anyone know what started our war on terror? Wasn't it the WTC falling? Wasn't it the war against osama? Does anyone realize OSAMA IS NOT IN IRAQ!!
So, our commitment in iraq is 10 years eh? So, how long is that until we can go after osama? I'm guessing he will die of old age, before being captured if republicans keep getting elected.
2007-09-27 06:19:46 · answer #4 · answered by santrega 1 · 3⤊ 2⤋
A Neo-Nazi would be in favor of exterminating you for being different or not agreeing with them. A Bush supporter would laugh at your childish ignorance
2007-09-27 05:54:08 · answer #5 · answered by heavysarcasm 4 · 3⤊ 3⤋
Nothing. It is common knowledge that the Bush family funded Hitler. I doubt those views have changed that much in two generations.
2007-09-27 05:58:04 · answer #6 · answered by justin ohio 3 · 4⤊ 1⤋
The answer shall be the same as "What's the difference between a Communist and a Democrat supporter?"
2007-09-27 05:54:46 · answer #7 · answered by Samm 6 · 3⤊ 2⤋
There's a difference?
2007-09-27 10:05:56 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
You would easily become best friends with a Neo-Nazi.
2007-09-27 06:00:02 · answer #9 · answered by Bob J 5 · 0⤊ 2⤋
As a democrat, I think your question is ridiculous and insulting. Say what you want about G.W., but no one can accuse him of being racist, or of supporting anything remotely associated with neo-nazis.
2007-09-27 05:58:52 · answer #10 · answered by Stephen L 6 · 2⤊ 3⤋
Nazis were socialists
Nazis slaughtered millions by defining them as sub human.
Nazis marched in the streets funded by shadowy foreign money.
Those "qualities" sound much more like a socialist, pro-abortion, MoreOn.org loving Lib. Don't they?
2007-09-27 05:56:51 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 3⤋