I find that some women are very confused about what they really want. On one hand, they don't like to be viewed as "loose". Yet on the other hand, they don't mind having sex for free with strangers whom they had just met at the clubs or from online websites. Now, isn't such women who provide sex for free tomere strangers worse than being a prostitute? At the very least, a hooker gets $$$ in return for a sex service done. Even if she faces consequences like HIV/Aids, she would have obtained something tangible.
So which seems more reasonable?
Provide sex for $$$ or Provide sex for free to strangers?
2007-09-27 05:02:53 · 4 answers · asked by Spinaround 2 in Society & Culture ➔ Cultures & Groups ➔ Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender
Actually, if we legalized this and taxed it, we could balance the bloody budget! Nevada seems to have no problem with legal brothels, why not the rest of the country. That way we could have clean, safe prostitution of both sexes, the workers and clients would both be protected and our government would have yet another source of taxable income. Okay, so the idiots would probably spend it on something stupid but that's beside the point since they seem to do that all the time....
2007-09-27 05:25:27 · answer #1 · answered by Mama Otter 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
how about the men who routinely have sex with these women? Aren't they worse than prostitutes? or is the fact that they are men excuse them from being loose s luts as well? I am sure somewhere in their neighbourhood they are put on the pedestal as cool players while the women are hiding away or trying to defend their reputation as loose. Crazy world. Men are more s lutty than women. Cease judging the women
2007-09-27 05:15:21 · answer #2 · answered by uz 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Neither are "worse" or bad. Why single out women, why not ask whether men are worse for having sex for free or paying for it?
Why is it "providing sex", don't you think that the women may enjoy and need it just like a male does?
This is a serious example of both repressive norms and the result of them.
2007-09-27 05:09:37 · answer #3 · answered by Pirate AM™ 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
you refer to sex with strangers as if it were some kind of demeaning service. sure, in some cases it is, but there are also women out there with libidos just as intense as men's, and the idea that consensual sex between strangers is somehow self sacrificing of the woman seems unnecessary/sexist. there's no reason to believe that the woman would enjoy it any less than the man.
2007-09-27 05:13:02 · answer #4 · answered by hannah 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋