After receiving yet another phone call from someone who refuses to show their identity in the Caller ID screen, I'm left to wonder, should it even be legal to call someone yet hide your identity? These companies constantly use unfamiliar abbreviations, code words, junk like a number with all "1's", etc.., in an attempt to hide who they really are. Shouldn't they be required by law not only to show their actual name and number in the display, but also tell you who they are? I've even had MCI lie to me in the past and claim not to be MCI. Thoughts?
2007-09-27
04:12:42
·
5 answers
·
asked by
cjc1127
2
in
Politics & Government
➔ Law & Ethics
For those mentioning collections agents, I am referring to general business solicitations, not debt collectors. I can see your point, but they have other ways of getting to you than hiding behind a screen. Think about it, though. Prank calls would be more difficult. Charities, voter lobbies, etc.., you could just see their name and not pick up. I don't feel I should have my desire to see who is calling before picking up nullified because someone else might be in debt.
2007-09-27
04:32:32 ·
update #1
Ankhorite :
You raise an incredibly valid point. I suppose a commercial entity legislation could deal with the bulk of our worries. However, I'm afraid if there was any loophole, a corporation or individual within said corporation would find a means of exploiting it. Here's a counter-offer for you to consider...what about making payphones not register on Caller ID, or just read as "PAYPHONE"? That way, the victim's/witness' anonymity is protected.
2007-09-27
04:43:42 ·
update #2