English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-09-27 04:12:07 · 15 answers · asked by Not so looney afterall 5 in Politics & Government Politics

Uh- I asked for Democrats to answer this question. What's wrong with the rest of you? Do I need to put up a Keep Out sign?

2007-09-27 04:18:04 · update #1

15 answers

I'd still vote for Obama, even though he didn't make a great showing because he had a cold.

Hillary acted like she was already President, saying she couldn't discuss certain things as if they were covered by executive privilege. I am less likely to vote for her now.

Edwards did well, but I still think he's a light-weight. I'd be more inclined to vote for him if his wife was in better health. I think she's a great adviser, and his administration would suffer if he loses her.

2007-09-27 04:25:46 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

I'm an **egalitarian** Republican... not among the bigots that usually come to mind with Republicans in the repressive Bush Era. But this question IS applicable to me, because I live in IOWA.

Here in Iowa, any person can legally participate in any primary election or caucus as being in any party he chooses... even by changing parties, on-site, as little as a MINUTE before casting his ballot!

So in the all-important and influencial Iowa Caucuses 13 weeks from now, I'll become a Democrat at the Democratic Caucus, and vote for HILLARY... who I think was the clear victor in last night's debate -- just as she **always** is the victor.

The next day, I'll return to the Republican Party, so I can keep working WITHIN it to destroy its bigoted aspects.

At the General Election, in 2008, the only Republican I would consider voting for is the PRO-Choice, PRO-Equal-Rights-for-Gays candidate, Rudy. If he's not nominated, I'll vote for whatever Democrat gets that nod.

Because I will NEVER vote for a bigot.

2007-09-27 04:50:22 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 4 0

If that replaced into his objective he does no longer have hogged 10% greater air time than Romney, which he did. No, Obama replaced into caught off base. He would possibly be tempted to come again back like a cornered rat next time, yet whilst he does he will look the two nasty and desperate. i do no longer think of that Obama can recuperate interior the debates, and Biden can basically make issues worse, yet interior the top the debates will possibly no longer count a rattling. Non-whites and commerce unionists are probable to vote for him regardless.

2016-10-09 22:21:13 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Joe Biden

2007-09-27 04:14:43 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

I'm not a democrat but this story says that Obama is beating the pants off of Hillary.
http://www.newsmax.com/headlines/obama_hillary/2007/09/26/35802.html?s=al&promo_code=3A85-1


And Rudy is a real threat to them both...

A survey by Democratic pollsters Lake Research found that Clinton – as well as Obama – trailed Republican hopeful Rudy Giuliani in 31 swing congressional districts.



The poll results – leaked to the Washington Post – show Giuliani leading Clinton by a margin of 49 percent to 39 percent in those districts. Giuliani’s lead over Obama is just 1 percent.

2007-09-27 04:15:41 · answer #5 · answered by Erinyes 6 · 1 5

Kucinich

2007-09-27 04:44:17 · answer #6 · answered by gone 7 · 2 1

Obama.

2007-09-27 04:19:13 · answer #7 · answered by Incognito 5 · 3 0

There is no one liberal enough running. Bring in Sheryl Crow and Rosie!

2007-09-27 04:28:23 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

Tim Russert!!

2007-09-27 04:25:50 · answer #9 · answered by john 2 · 0 3

Thompson, I would never vote for a democrat in my life

2007-09-27 04:15:30 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2 5

fedest.com, questions and answers