I'd still vote for Obama, even though he didn't make a great showing because he had a cold.
Hillary acted like she was already President, saying she couldn't discuss certain things as if they were covered by executive privilege. I am less likely to vote for her now.
Edwards did well, but I still think he's a light-weight. I'd be more inclined to vote for him if his wife was in better health. I think she's a great adviser, and his administration would suffer if he loses her.
2007-09-27 04:25:46
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
I'm an **egalitarian** Republican... not among the bigots that usually come to mind with Republicans in the repressive Bush Era. But this question IS applicable to me, because I live in IOWA.
Here in Iowa, any person can legally participate in any primary election or caucus as being in any party he chooses... even by changing parties, on-site, as little as a MINUTE before casting his ballot!
So in the all-important and influencial Iowa Caucuses 13 weeks from now, I'll become a Democrat at the Democratic Caucus, and vote for HILLARY... who I think was the clear victor in last night's debate -- just as she **always** is the victor.
The next day, I'll return to the Republican Party, so I can keep working WITHIN it to destroy its bigoted aspects.
At the General Election, in 2008, the only Republican I would consider voting for is the PRO-Choice, PRO-Equal-Rights-for-Gays candidate, Rudy. If he's not nominated, I'll vote for whatever Democrat gets that nod.
Because I will NEVER vote for a bigot.
2007-09-27 04:50:22
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
0⤋
If that replaced into his objective he does no longer have hogged 10% greater air time than Romney, which he did. No, Obama replaced into caught off base. He would possibly be tempted to come again back like a cornered rat next time, yet whilst he does he will look the two nasty and desperate. i do no longer think of that Obama can recuperate interior the debates, and Biden can basically make issues worse, yet interior the top the debates will possibly no longer count a rattling. Non-whites and commerce unionists are probable to vote for him regardless.
2016-10-09 22:21:13
·
answer #3
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Joe Biden
2007-09-27 04:14:43
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
I'm not a democrat but this story says that Obama is beating the pants off of Hillary.
http://www.newsmax.com/headlines/obama_hillary/2007/09/26/35802.html?s=al&promo_code=3A85-1
And Rudy is a real threat to them both...
A survey by Democratic pollsters Lake Research found that Clinton – as well as Obama – trailed Republican hopeful Rudy Giuliani in 31 swing congressional districts.
The poll results – leaked to the Washington Post – show Giuliani leading Clinton by a margin of 49 percent to 39 percent in those districts. Giuliani’s lead over Obama is just 1 percent.
2007-09-27 04:15:41
·
answer #5
·
answered by Erinyes 6
·
1⤊
5⤋
Kucinich
2007-09-27 04:44:17
·
answer #6
·
answered by gone 7
·
2⤊
1⤋
Obama.
2007-09-27 04:19:13
·
answer #7
·
answered by Incognito 5
·
3⤊
0⤋
There is no one liberal enough running. Bring in Sheryl Crow and Rosie!
2007-09-27 04:28:23
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
Tim Russert!!
2007-09-27 04:25:50
·
answer #9
·
answered by john 2
·
0⤊
3⤋
Thompson, I would never vote for a democrat in my life
2007-09-27 04:15:30
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
5⤋