No. My hometown of Newark, NJ where those three kids were brutally murdered by illegal immigrants is a sanctuary city.
I will NOT support Democrats OR Republicans who endorse sanctuary cities.
2007-09-27 03:48:44
·
answer #1
·
answered by Still Beautifully Conservative 5
·
4⤊
0⤋
Of course not, personally, I think all federal funds should be withheld from all sanctuary cities until they decide to change that status. But you had to know that the democrats would agree with this strategy, when is the last time you saw the dems stand for anything that was good for the US?
2007-09-27 10:52:05
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
No. I can't believe that ANYBODY in this Country would want or tolerate a Sancutary City. Illegal aliens, to include: rapists, murderers, drug dealers, child molestors and gang members flock to these cities because they know that the Police cannot and will not ask them about their citizenship.
What if that individual that the Police Officer has stopped is a Murderer that gives a false name, because most ILLEGALS use fake or stolen social security numbers and IDs. They are probably the biggest contributor of Identity Theft.
There is no way to track them as they live thier lives under up to 20 aliases. They are a menace and should be dealt with accordingly. DEPORTATION!
Bleeding hearts will tell you that everyone has the right to want to live a free life.....BULL! Our ancestors fought for OUR rights....OUR men and women are fighting for OTHERS to have rights in THEIR countries...NOT OURS.
How can liberals be so against the war in Iraq, when the soldiers are trying to GIVE the people freedom, yet they want everyone named Juan and Pablo to have freedoms in the U.S.? Hypocrisy?
Why don't all liberals call their homes Sancutary Homes and invite these illegals in? They should feed them, clothe them and educate them on their dime NOT MINE!
2007-09-27 11:43:36
·
answer #3
·
answered by Zuper Z 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
No
There is one big reason for them doing so, the votes - (another is the convolution of our culture (what does that historically lead to?))
Two comments from two unknown individuals, “Loge” and “Heidenlord” from Skadi Forum the largest Germanic online community forum:
Loge:
“seems that the uneducated immigrants usually vote towards the liberal party, wonder why that is?”
Heidenlord:
It has to do with a number of factors I believe. The first being socialist democracy. Democracy has been called "two wolves and a sheep voting on what to have for dinner" and I think it sums it up nicely.
A "hand-out" system will eventually corrupt even the best work ethic of the most respectable germanics, but for minorities it is a free-for-all. The poor will always outnumber the rich and when the poor are given the same amount of voting power as the rich it is only a matter of time until they vote themselves the national treasury. The framers of the American Constitution understood this and only allowed land-owning males the right to vote because they understood that only those who have a vested interest in the affairs of the government should have a say in government.
The greatest fallacy in the world is to give someone who can't make money, buy land, or lead a normal life a say in government. What makes people believe that individuals who are failures are going to make a wise choice altogether, I will never know. Governments don't run on good intentions but are governed by the same laws of nature that guide everything else here on earth; governments cannot take blood from a stone nor can they create wealth, they really only consume wealth.
When governments start taking orders from those who can't even balance their own checkbook, we know the end is near. All Democracies have ended in a dictatorship because one day the "free lunch" is over and someone has to stand up and say this and be prepared to "bash some heads" when the hangovers start from the democracy/socialism induced free-for-all.
2007-09-27 10:48:10
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
3⤋
As a Dem. I don't agree with the concept of sanctuary cities.
2007-09-27 10:50:28
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
6⤊
0⤋
I don't agree with sanctuary cities, however, until you show me the source for your endorsement by all the candidates I will consider you just another Dem bashing radical.
2007-09-27 10:53:31
·
answer #6
·
answered by grumpyoldman 7
·
0⤊
2⤋
All sanctuary cities should be denied all federal aid.
2007-09-27 10:48:01
·
answer #7
·
answered by makrothumeo2 4
·
6⤊
0⤋
Of course not. At the very least if someone is arrested for a crime and it is found that they are here illegally then Federal authorities should be brought in immediately..............
2007-09-27 10:48:08
·
answer #8
·
answered by Brian 7
·
4⤊
0⤋
No, they're giving sanctuary to murderers, drunk drivers, pedophiles and other criminals. Apparently the Democrats believe that we don't have enough hardened criminals in the USA and we should be accepting them from other countries so that our own bill-paying citizens can be further victimized.
2007-09-27 10:50:17
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
3⤋
Why do you want to burdon local public resources to do the job of the federal government? Police officers are hired to stop crime, not round up illegals.
2007-09-27 10:53:02
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
3⤋