2007-09-27 03:13:16 · 11 answers · asked by Spartacus 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
its amazing how the words you use frames the debate. prolife people dont use the word antilife. Why not? I think if you can use the word on yourself then you should fairly use its anti- on your opponent. I would like to see an end to creative uses of things like hawks and doves etc. Its prowar and antiwar.
Prolife is such a feel good word. Because everyone is basically prolife its misapplied to the abortion debate because it implies a group that any normal person would want to be a part of. The antilife however is completely unpalatable. They cant use it because its very extreme sounding. Despite the drive to demonize their opponents and how they truely feel inside they cannot compel themselves to use the word they so desperately believe in.
2007-09-27 06:05:13 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
No, I'm pretty sure all the candidates are for choices. But, let's be clear. A choice is what you make at a restaurant, you make a choice when you go to buy a new TV. You make a choice when you decide whether or not to have sex.
Abortion should not be a choice... ever!
Abortion is murder of an innocent child, a child is not a choice. The baby had no choice, you made it. I'm sure if you ask the baby what his or her choice is, die or no die, she will choose to live!
So stop trying to sugar coat your intention, just to justify in your mind. Abortion kills innocent babies.
2007-09-27 10:29:45 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
No Rudy is PRO Abortion the rest are pro life...
Rudy is the only Democrat running Republican
the Rest are REPUBLICANS!
2007-09-27 10:21:59 · answer #3 · answered by KittyCatFishApe 3 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Ron Paul is pro life on a personal level, but his philosophy is the government cannot enforce their personal beliefs on the citizens.. He will leave that choice up to the states..
As far as Giuliani goes, I wouldn't trust him.. he has flip flopped on many issues, and I wouldn't be surprised if he got the nom and changed his mind on abortion. He was pro gay marriage in the beginning then he changed to only supporting civil unions but no gay marriage..
2007-09-27 10:23:09 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
I believe Rudy is the only pro-abortion candidate and the rest are pro-life......
2007-09-27 10:16:36 · answer #5 · answered by Brian 7 · 3⤊ 1⤋
Actually, I believe that Rudy is the only candidate to really take a position on abortion. He has stated over and over that he is personally opposed to it, but he would not allow his personal feelings to interfere with executive decisions. That is not really a pro-choice position.
2007-09-27 10:20:38 · answer #6 · answered by fangtaiyang 7 · 0⤊ 4⤋
i like that "Anti-choice" that's a good spin. I'm all for choice. how about not having sex if you can't deal with the consequences. what about the choice of the child that is being aborted? it's their body. why are hey not given a chance to live?
on a side note, to all those who hate this country. i don't hate this person who asked this question. i disagree with them but not hate them because of their views. our fore-fathers left us with a document second to nothing man has written. it gave us the power to speak our mind without fear of imprisonment for our views. no matter how twisted they are.http://education.yahoo.com/reference/encyclopedia/entry/USConstTABLE;_ylt=AiHhX4GdzLtyS0Fwh.VhCmVTt8wF
2007-09-27 10:22:53 · answer #7 · answered by jay f 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I think Ron Paul is pro choice also.
2007-09-27 10:18:42 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 3⤋
Don't know where any candidates stand to be honest.
2007-09-27 16:55:36 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Pretty much, but Giuliani has said he won't force his opinions on Congress or the courts - which is really how it should be anyways.
2007-09-27 10:16:14 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 3⤋