English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2 days ago someone copy&pasted this X's official picture on to the back of some old woman in north Africa and yesterday, we were told, that picture was passed on to Interpol.
Today, we are told, 'hold your horses'... that picture was not of X (it in fact was but was also a very poor 'Paintshop Pro' job, LOL) and we are told that X was in fact a little blonde girl of north African origin (LOL). Problem is, that second girl, Y, was not the one, X, appearing in the first doctored picture.
Am I seeing things or is anyone else also confused like me.
I mean, the girl they showed on the news today is NOT the girl copied and pasted on the forged photo of yesterday 'cause that one is in fact the real missing little girl.
Anyone else also confused about all this like me ??
That stupid Spanish woman who says she took that photo should be put behind bars -- she obviously forged it !!!

2007-09-27 02:47:40 · 12 answers · asked by RED-CHROME 6 in News & Events Current Events

12 answers

thats not hard.......Madeline mccann!!!!! getting ridiculous isnt it!I know its sad she is still missing but the papers front pages have been the same for weeks, and you know what on page 11? "Another Soldier Killed".........need I say more

2007-09-27 02:57:33 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

Well for some it was a sliver of hope that she was still alive. Who gives a crap about photoshop. If my child was missing I would want all leads investigated even if the majority thought it was a hoax. It was proven it was not a fake, it was proven who the little girl is and Dave S. actually posted a link to a close up picture of this little one with her parent that was very clear and she could nearly pass as Madeleines twin. And for those who said who carries a 4 year old on their back..this little girl who was of small stature was 5 years old.

2007-09-27 05:29:02 · answer #2 · answered by Ladybugs77 6 · 1 1

Madeline McCann

2007-09-27 02:50:42 · answer #3 · answered by Jessie H 6 · 3 0

grainy photos are very tricky. I think it was real. It just wasn't her. There are so many kids with that look - haircut, etc.
It was so blurry you couldn't see - i think if the spanish lady did anything she blurred it up so you couldn't tell who it was.
If she did do that, she needs to be put through the same hell the Mccanns are going through

2007-09-27 02:52:15 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

What a load of confused and confusing twaddle. Who says it was a photo shopped pic except a load of amateur sleuths on these boards? Trash.

2007-09-27 03:27:42 · answer #5 · answered by Skidoo 7 · 0 1

Misty blue got it.Why is everyone obsessed with this?What are these people doing leaving their kids sleeping 25,40,60,70 yards away

2007-09-27 03:45:53 · answer #6 · answered by Ninky Nonk---In The Night Garden 4 · 1 0

Ian Beale.

2007-09-27 04:43:56 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

Genette Tate?

2007-09-27 03:18:16 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 3

You need to get out more.

2007-09-27 02:56:37 · answer #9 · answered by Misty Blue 7 · 1 4

the woman is just a slag.

2007-09-27 02:50:44 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

fedest.com, questions and answers