What has/had more danger to offer 8 years of Hitler building his army/ the 8 seconds after Iran has a Nuke?

Question

we know the outcome of WW2 for sure and the horrors Hitler was able to effect on the world after 8 years of building his armed services. Is it more or less scary than when the Liberal world allows Iran to secure Nukes?

I dedicate this to your last anser Planksheer....

forgive my Iraqi red dust filled Keyboard.

David R Please look at the cost in dollars and Men in the Civil war, WW1 and 2 and then get back to me on costs! this is not a drop in the Bucket to the American Economy and M

cookies - Thanks.

Pens will " iran" get to vote on this? Sorry I do not believe the Islamic Fundies will let the Ulimate sacrifice of the Land Known as Iran stop them from the destruction of Israel. I believe they would allow it to further the Mission. Islamist do not believe in "Countries" and borders. You ask your German Muslims friends I will believe the Islamic Fundies running around here.

Answer 1

Ahmadinejad is the anti christ, he is a demented demonic devil, and we have to stop him dead in his tracks before we "ALL" live to rue the day.

God Bless You Thorgirl and thank you for your service.

"GOD BLESS OUR TROOP'S"

P.S pensterx, WTF are you talking about?, Iran ie: Ahmadinejad and his regime, are responsible for the murder of thousands of our troop's in Iraq and Afghanistan, "FACT"

Answer 2

Please. Iran acquiring a nuke is worthless: we'll enter the MAD scenario and we'll either nuke each other or be forced into diplomacy. Iran could never hope to do any significant lasting damage before we turned their country into a glass parking lot. I have no doubt that if Iran launched 1 nuke, all of her people would be destroyed. I don't even think the Iranian leadership is interested in deploying nuclear weapons, at this point they make a better bargaining chip than intimidation tactic.

When Hitler amassed his forces, he had a large conventional army without any unconventional weapons to stop him. If there were nukes pointed at Hitler and he knew it, history would have been much different.

Answer 3

To the Liberal zombies that give all liberals a bad name:

The liberal world will not allow Iran to build a nuke. Just because a small portion of the liberal world is LOST and cant read or more or less understand what is the TRUTH does not mean that the rest of us will follow them down the road to the world destruction.

TO: ZULU 1 You need to read a little more and undersatnd their has been more than one nuke exploded. The nuclear powers have conducted at least 2,000 nuclear test explosions across the world.

Now their have been test that have killed and are still killing people do a little research on Fangataufa and Mururoa atolls

TO pensterx: I think you need to read a little more on Iran thier is a link below that could expand your mind a little.

Its funny but their is a connection between the two Hitler and Radical Islam
From Al Husseini to Hitler :Radical Islam and the Nazi connection (see second Link)

Answer 4

why do you libs see a piece of writing and cherry p.c.. what you submit to in strategies from it a militia respectable advised CNN there became into no nuclear danger to public protection by using fact the weapons weren't armed. officers have faith that if the airplane had crashed or the missiles by some skill had fallen off the wings, the warheads could have remained inert and there could have been no nuclear detonation, nonetheless universal explosive cloth in the warhead would have detonated. militia officers additionally say the missiles would desire to not have been released by using fact of assorted protection suggestions required to be enacted before any launch could have been approved. Shepperd agreed with militia officers that the situation would desire to not have led to a nuclear detonation. yet he further, "Any time you have nuclear cloth on board, if the airplane crashes, nuclear cloth may well be unfold in the instantaneous component of the crash, so which you get radioactivity in the instantaneous component of the crash." "it is severe business enterprise, in spite of the shown fact that it became into not risky business enterprise," Shepperd mentioned.

Answer 5

The three decades Iran has been developing their nuclear program...

Iran's nuclear program began under the Shah in 1974, but was abruptly suspended following the Islamic revolution in 1978-79. The Shah also conducted research in the production of fissile material, but these efforts were suspended during the revolution and the Iran-Iraq war. It was not until 1984 that Ayatollah Khomeini revived Iran's nuclear weapons program. There are some indications that he did so reluctantly, viewing these weapons as amoral. In 1987 and 1988, the reactor sites at Bushehr I and II were damaged by Iraqi air strikes, and progress was again arrested.

Answer 6

I'll take the 8 seconds over the 8 years anyday.

Why?

Because Iran uses the Nuke, Iran gets turned into a glass punch bowl.

Peace

Jim

.

Answer 7

I see the U S as a far greater menace. We are on the verge of yet another pre emptive strike that will kill tens of thousands of innocent people out of fear. This kind of reasoning is based on the assumption that the ends justify the means. Our planned attack against Iran will be a crime against humanity of unfathomable dimensions - and you are cheerleading for it. If our so called leadership reasons like this, i fear for the future of the world.

Answer 8

WWII came close to the end of the world Hitler was on a fast track to gaining the nuke and other weapons( WMD).
Iran gets it or any other Islamic country and the end is certain and even France See's this yes the French French.
Iran and it's 12er's must bring the end for their holy one the 12 imam to come back and rule.
Unlike Christin's we are not to bring this only Gods knows when and it looks like Iran s bringing the date closer.

Answer 9

There's no such thing as the Liberal world. It's Russia that's selling arms to Iran. And it's the European Union & the American left who's scared to do anything about it. I don't know what has more danger. Hitler told the world his plans by writing Mein Kampf, & Ahmadinejad is telling the world his plans by giving speeches before large crowds in Iran. I think the United States along with some Arab nations will do something before Iran has the chance to kill millions of innocent people.

Answer 10

It is less scary. If Iran was able to get the right kind of weapon they could kill as many people as Hitler did in 8 year, in a matter of seconds.

Answer 11

More danger in Iran we saw that with two limited atomic weapons at the end of WWII.