labels such as homophonic on others as if they had some physiological disability, just blows me away. How dare you. The basic purpose of the existence of life is to exist. Two of the same sex can not procreate, thus a perversion of the natural order of life. So who has the physiological disability here. I really could care less about anyone’s private habits, it’s when perverts shove this behavior down our throats and have expositions such as the S&M gay day in in STREETS of San Francisco and other place, where children are expose to sexual content with dildos, whips, chains , bondage, and other sick displays of that life style that is WRONG and completely inappropriate.
2007-09-27 02:05:29 · 19 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Homophobia is an irrational and uncontrollable fear (like all phobias) of homosexuals and/or homosexuality. If you don't have that, then you're not a homophobe.
Beware idiots that will label you as a homophobe/racist/sexist every time you disagree with their lifestyle. It's an attempt to label you with something so derogatory that you'll drop your argument just to avoid the label.
That's not to say those people who truly fit those labels don't exist, they do. Just don't worry when someone isn't intelligent enough to debate with you and so labels you instead.
2007-09-27 02:08:49 · answer #1 · answered by Chad 5 · 9⤊ 0⤋
Maybe your basic purpose is to procreate, maybe others have a different purpose. Are those who take a vow of chastity also perverting the natural order? What about heterosexual couples who engage in acts of sodomy (which includes oral sex see Bowers v. Hardwich http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=us&vol=478&invol=186#f1) or use birth control? These things were all illegal in most of our country at one time or another (Yes, even birth control was illegal see Griswold v. Connecticut, 381 U.S. 479 .http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/cgi-bin/getcase.pl?navby=case&court=us&vol=381&invol=479).
Do you think we should return to regulating sexual behavior?
Sexual behavior in public is already regulated. You say ", it’s when perverts shove this behavior down our throats and have expositions such as the S&M gay day in in STREETS of San Francisco and other place, where children are expose to sexual content with dildos, whips, chains , bondage, and other sick displays of that life style that is WRONG and completely inappropriate." Its always about children . . . children might see it. There are two answers to this, one don't take your children to the Gay Day Parade or two, talk to your children about what you believe is right and wrong.
Calling all homosexuals perverts doesn't make you a homophobe but it does make you a homosexual hater. As for your morality questions, again I suggest that there are many, many heterosexuals who engage in what many religious people would call deviant practices. When you are morally crusading against the practices and not solely a small percentage of those who practice them, then we may think you are truly genuine in your crusade.
2007-09-27 03:02:43 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
The whole homosexual equal rights thing has gone haywire. I agree a person shouldn't lose there job or be discriminated against because they are homosexual ( I refrain from using gay) I do however find it a tad bit sick trying to win over the world to homosexuality. It's not normal. Plain and simple it is a miswire in their brain for most. ( I recognize some do choose) It is a small segment in our population, 4% I think, and so I do not understand why it needs to be glorified. No you're not a homophobe, you just happen to have an opinion like everyone else.
2007-09-27 02:31:23 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
No it doesn't. That is a label that is being thrown out to anyone who doesn't accept nor see homosexuality as a 'normal' lifestyle. I could personally care less what people do behind closed doors and prefer that sexuality whether it be gay or straight, not be thrown into my face. I also do not support changing school texts to reflect homosexuality as being normal. That doesn't mean that I'm anti-gay.
Politic Correctness has gone through the roof. Here is something that I received in an email this morning from a good friend and it reflects the feelings of many:
"Political Correctness is a doctrine fostered by a delusional, illogical minority, and rapidly promoted by an unscrupulous mainstream media, which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a turd by the clean end."
2007-09-27 02:19:21 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 6⤊ 1⤋
No. It makes you a moral and decent person.
Is there any scientific proof that they are born that way, or is it a learned behavior?
For SteveA8....A M/F couple using a codom is a natural human instinct where they are being carfeul,(i.e. diseases) and when the woman cannot get pregnant, it is an unfortunate thing that should not be brought up, questioned or ridiculed. Just because a female has had trouble or is infertile has nothing to do with perversion. IT IS STILL NATURAL! The only perversion here are your views.
A M/M or F/F relationship is a human abnormality, a sickness, that when traced back shows abuse, inferiority complexes and rebellion.
Funny, I've never seen to male lions living together humping one another, or two birds or two giraffes or two bears...have you? It is not normal, IT IS a perversion.
Watch out "Don't Taze Me Bro" the liberal gay lefties are going to call you a homophobe, but there are alot more people who live in reality...not immorality.
When did homosexual activity become acceptable in our society, on our televisions and in our schools? I guess we never saw it coming....to bad.
2007-09-27 03:28:08 · answer #5 · answered by Zuper Z 2 · 1⤊ 2⤋
I think you go a bit overboard by calling what they do perversion in a broad sense. I do not like to see males engaging in sexual activity with other males, but I would not go so far as to say it's perverted. By your argument, anyone engaging in sex who could not procreate should be labeled a pervert. Therefore people practicing safe sex using a condom, people who masturbate, couples where the woman has passed menopause or cannot conceive, if they have sex, they are all perverts, right? If that is your position, then it may not make you a homophobe, but it does make you seem like an intolerant jerk.
Zuper Z, you better go to a dictionary and find out what an instinct is. You may not share my view of thinking that homosexuality is not a perversion, you have a right to be wrong. People are people and they come is a lot of shapes, sizes, colors, ethnicities, and sexual behaviors. The Psychologists removed Homosexual behavior from the Diagnostic Manual because They believe it is not a perversion.
2007-09-27 02:41:08 · answer #6 · answered by SteveA8 6 · 1⤊ 3⤋
The question that may not a lot the opposing of a existence-type as following the sexual rules in the Bible and for marriage. Having intercourse with a individual of an identical gender is considered incorrect. Marriage grow to be created with the aid of God (Adam and Eve) with the aid of his putting 2 persons mutually to grow to be one and it is that theory that determines what a marriage is at present additionally. even though i individually disagree with the gay existence-type, I do understand what they recommend while they say they desire to spend their existence with the guy they love. yet, as marriage is interpreted at present, that could not ensue in maximum places and could be fought against with the aid of maximum believers (consisting of me). Atheism on the different hand is a theory equipment that doesn't have self belief in God. it incredibly is a private selection and has no criminal definition nor does it contain a settlement that would influence belongings distribution/possession etc. In otherwords, being an atheist isn't unlawful and being an atheist isn't a existence-type...it is a theory.
2016-10-20 03:10:53 · answer #7 · answered by coiscou 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No. It makes you sane. And by this, I mean no hatred to those who are homosexual.
I do not want anyone of any sexual orientation in my face with their proclivities.
ADDED: Ken, I had the unfortunate experience of randomly landing at Disney World on "gay day," with my 7 1/2 year old step-daughter in tow. A 4 hour drive (each way) to Disney and the dreams of a little girl got side-tracked so that a bunch of insecure creeps could act out their fantasy of acceptance.
2007-09-27 02:19:47 · answer #8 · answered by ? 7 · 4⤊ 0⤋
Now you know why the rest of the country calls San Francisco-
San Fran Sicko
You're not homophobic- unlike what people will tell you:
You have the right to disapprove of whatever you like.
You have the right to dislike whatever you like.
Other people have the right to do the same.
Do you know why you have this right- because you were born with free will and no one can demand you like them or accept them if you don't want to.
So exercise that free will- God knows no one else has any problem exercising theirs no matter how tasteless it makes them look.
2007-09-27 02:13:48 · answer #9 · answered by tnfarmgirl 6 · 4⤊ 0⤋
You are correct. Okay I'm a tattooed, Caucasian male that dips tobacco, yet live in a huge house and drive a Mercedes. I hate the redneck lifestyle. Does that make me a racist against them? I wouldn't think so. You don't like the sexual lifestyle led by some, it is your right and you should not be labeled because of it.
2007-09-27 02:31:32 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋