English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I adore quite a number of actors. However, I can never tell which are method actors and which are not. I am just in love with their performances. After browsing some sources, I can only say most actors that are regarded as method actors do always portray intense/neurotic characters. Is there a relation? And can u ever tell? If yes, how?

2007-09-27 00:19:06 · 2 answers · asked by I am only human 1 in Arts & Humanities Theater & Acting

2 answers

A lot of method acting teachers cross the line into psychology and therapy. Strasberg was accused of this many times. I have found that many teachers and coaches who are heavy proponents of method acting could profit from therapy and they tend towards intense/neurotic characters as those are closer to who they are.

2007-09-27 04:26:52 · answer #1 · answered by DramaGuy 7 · 0 0

Wow, somebody's still having the acting debates from the 1950s. I fondly recall how serious people argued over whether method acting was the salvation or damnation of drama. How can you tell if someone is a method actor? Watch a rehearsal or see the actor working on a part. The method actor is intensely concerned with motivation, with analyzing the beats of the scene and describing the character's intention with an action verb. The technical actor is concerned with how to present the scene to the audience. Backstage, the method actor will be using emotional memory exercises. The technical actor will be doing her/his customary preparation. When it's time to weep onstage, the method actor will work his/her emotions into a genuine sorrow, the technical actor will rely on more mechanical means like not blinking. Theatre, like so many other things, can achieve similar results from a wide range of methods. I appreciate the distinctions between method and technical actors, or between organic and predetermined directing--it's important to be able to tell how you're doing what you do--but I've never noted clearly superior results from any theoretical approach; instead I've found that people of different bents can work together respectfully and that's what generates the best outcome for all involved.

2016-05-19 22:30:21 · answer #2 · answered by ? 3 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers