According to McFraudster spokesperson, Kate McFraudster knew instinctivly that her daughter was stolen to order and taken to North Africa. So she apparently has knowledge of how child kidnap gangs work and the routes they use etc. Is this the same Kate McFraudster who said they were only guilty of being naive when Madeleine first went missing as they had no idea that this sort of thing went on. They just can't keep up with their lies and deceit. By the way all your insults etc are water off a duck's back to me. Have a nice day all.
2007-09-26 23:13:03 · 51 answers · asked by trancebabe 4 in News & Events ➔ Current Events
Jane C. I am calling Kate McCann a fraud because she and her husband have CONNED people into sending money to LOOK FOR Madeleine and thay are spending it on their MORTGAGE and LIVING EXPENSES and that is straight from the mouth of Clarence Mitchell. If that isn't fraud I don't know what is, and still they ask for more,ie The online Madeleine memorabilia shop. It's insane.
2007-09-26 23:42:41 · update #1
Well said! Good for you!
One of these days they are going to trip themselves up, disastrously!
This whole farce is becoming more like a circus each day!
Naive my ar_se, they must have known leaving them alone was dangerous, but their nights out were more important!
All the two of them see now are pound signs!
OMG! CT, I actually cried watching that video!
You need to post that as a question!
And let everyone see it
2007-09-26 23:42:57 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 7⤊ 7⤋
nothing adds up does it why leave them alone when they could have had a babysitter? and dont pro mccanns start with the they didnt want to leave them with strangers $hite considering that the so called strangers were fobbed off with the mccann kids every single day! if they wanted a holiday without kids being around them they should have left them at home there is now a beautiful 4 year old girl who is either dead or suffering god knows what down to the hands of this very selfish couple who seem to be doing everything but look for their missing daughter its about time charges were pressed on them for child neglect and the two twins taken away after all if they had been working class or a family on benefits the kids would have been taken long ago they are not fit to be parents after what suposedley happened!
2007-09-26 23:48:33 · answer #2 · answered by Agent Zero® 5 · 6⤊ 2⤋
finally, someone who can see the light!
I've known they were frauds from the second it was broadcast that maddie was missing.
they should never have been allowed to keep their twins and should have been arrested for child neglect regardless of what "actually" happened.
their a pair of liars and dont deserve to be parents. just shows that karma can come around and bite you on the backside!
i hope maddie is ok and at peace now because who knows what ordeals she has gone through, she would be scarred for life if she was alive now and was found.
poor child didnt ask for neglectful parents like them. she deserved so much better and so do so many children.
they sooo planned this just for money and publicity. they dont and didnt care about their daughter. in fact they even said she was a nightmare to have around. what parent says that about a 4 yr old! they all misbehave at that age but no parent actually openly says my child is awful and i want to go out alone with my partner and just leave them in the hotel in a foreign country.
no parent in their right mind would leave their child home alone in this day and age in their home country so what the hel were they thinking?!
i just wanna slap them so hard and take their twins off them so this doesnt happen again. id have them both sterilised as well just to make sure!
2007-09-27 01:40:10 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
When Maddie disappeared, kate actually said: THEY have taken her. Instead of I can't find maddie, and maddie has disappeared. Why she knew maddie had been taken or not she walked out as they left the door unlocked. Why she said THEY. What does she know? Who are THEY?
You got a star, not insults.
2007-09-27 08:04:09 · answer #4 · answered by anthony j 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
well said , 20 stars is a good measure
i watched crimewatch last night and wondered why people like richard branson dosent put his money into solving other crimes
some horrific things happening in this world
2007-09-27 06:06:00 · answer #5 · answered by stacey 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Another day another story! Take your pick from the lines that the McCanns and their faction have been handing out. God only knows what the truth is here, but I am beginning to to swing to the opinion that we are NOT going to hear it from the McCanns any time soon.
2007-09-27 00:14:39 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 2⤋
You my man have definite shades of Dave s about the way you worded your question. It is full on innuendo and the offer of incitement to insult your meagre attempt to open up this sad affair on here again.
Things were starting to settle down and folk were realising that there is very little tangible evidence against Kate McCann.
All I can say is that you are just clutching at straws but for what motive I have no idea other than you are one sad BXRXTXRD.
2007-09-26 23:53:13 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 5⤋
I really dont know what to think any more, every time I think I understand something happens and I change my mind. I think its just time now to sit and wait for answers. I think though that we will never find out what happened that night.
2007-09-26 23:27:01 · answer #8 · answered by Emma B 3 · 9⤊ 1⤋
Mrs McC makes Dr Shipman seem a friendly guy
2007-09-27 00:05:55 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 3⤋
I do see there are holes in the kate mccan story, but I dont believe that it was odd assuming she was stolen to order.
I assumed she was stolen by paedophiles for child trafficking, its also a likely story, its also very likely that she has been taken to order. This was my first assumption and that of many others. It does not make me guilt of theft, it does not make anyone else who assumes this guilty of paedophilia and it doesnot make Kate Mccan guilty of murder.
I dont want to take sides, so I dont, this is becasue I dont feel I have a right to. I see what the media decide to publish, and not the whole story. I hear vague stories here and then other ontradicting ones else where. You have only got to re-read the balls-up by a recent newspaper saying the Queen stormed out of a interview, whn infact it was lies. It is therfre very apparent the media have a sole purpose to build up peoples ideas and build up peoples assumptions and get people to buy more papers, so I dont think its right to judge unless I am on the jury of this case and pary to all information, and even then I would be one within a group of others, I wouldnt have the final say and I wouldnt be judging so harshly without real evidence.
2007-09-26 23:24:22 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 9⤊ 8⤋
Im not going to insult you either..one because i don't you but mainly cause life's too short for all that !
However i do agree with you on this...as i can't believe that a GP who will see and witness so many of lifes awful things..could possibly use the word naive !
So yes it amazed me aswell !
2007-09-26 23:31:55 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 9⤊ 4⤋