Why do peacemakers always get a good beating when they try to have a peaceful protest for political change?

Answer 1

because they are annoying

Answer 2

Normally cause the "peacemakers" start attacking people or police. Not always, but most times. It's usually the anarchists that start and the actual protestors there trying to make a difference have to suffer too.

Answer 3

Various reasons:

1. They are not in touch with reality and do more harm than good for the majority of the human race.
2. They have nothing better to do with their time.
3. They are abusive and can turn violent.
4. They hide behing the word 'peacemaker' as a disguise for other hidden agendas.

Answer 4

Because there are vicious, controlling people out there who's only way it to be aggressive and want to rule in their way only, hence the protests in Burma, Zimbabwe, all end the same way, force of arms, against monks and ordinary people trying to change, which is what these thugs don't want.

Answer 5

1. They don't all turn violent.
2. Often its the "peaceful protesters" that are the ones that start the violence.

Answer 6

if it was peaceful and keep to their line they would not. you must be taking about people who live under a opressive regime and they are the one's who let it be like that, through living there and not getting out , people need followers without it would not be

Answer 7

Because wimps insult our intelligence.

It's so obvious that they are just scared stiff that they may have to go and the fact that they want us to abandon the Iraqi only proves the point that they care for no one but themselves.

Answer 8

In the case of Burma, certain political groups which happen to be in power at the time don't like political change. In the case of hippie liberals, they just smell bad.

Answer 9

It takes two to tango.

Answer 10

ya its funny as hell