He says he's not. But why the foot tapping and wide stance and putting his hand under the stall into the next stall in a public restroom?
Why doesn't the moron resign??
2007-09-26 17:01:50 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
HE'S A PUBLIC FIGURE IN A PUBLIC BATHROOM AND IT MOST DEFINATELY IS NOT A PRIVATE ISSUE UNDER THOSE CIRCUMSTANCES!!!!
2007-09-26 17:12:36 · update #1
When he pled guilty, he automatically came out of the closet. There's nothing wrong with being gay, since it's merely a variation of NORMALCY, just like handedness and eye color.
But there are scumbag gays and scumbag straights.
Larry Craig is a scumbag HYPOCRITE who opposed **equal** rights for gays (while **being** one himself!) AND a scumbag lowlife who looks for sex in public restrooms. In airports, yet!!
2007-09-27 02:17:29 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
I am not gay, and never have been. I am the victim of a witch hunt... A witch hunt against people that eat a lot of fiber.
Because I eat a lot of fiber, I have to take a wide stance when I take a massive dump. The wide stance increases the power I can bring to bear. And honestly when that turd just won't cooperate, I need every megapascal of pressure that the wide stance affords me.
Apparently, in some perverse circles, taking a wide stance in a public bathroom is somehow indicative of a request for sex. Can you believe that? It's so disgusting!
When I'm really applying the intestinal pressure, I shake and tap my foot. It's absurd that such a completely normal reaction to the stress I'm putting on my body could be misconstrued as requesting sex!
And when I really have to go deep down inside myself to force out a monster turd, I shout phrases like, "I am requesting gay sex!" How my shouting of the phrase, "I am requesting gay sex!" could ever be construed as a request for sex, I'll never know.
2007-09-27 18:06:46 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
You cannot assume that a person who molests children is in any way trustworthy. To take their word for anything after you know for a fact they have done that, is nothing short of stupid. Gender preference is completely irrelevant anyway, since there are probably as many gay pedophiles as straight pedophiles proportional to the population its the age, not the sexual orientation that defines the crime. it is no more illegal or immoral to molest a child of the opposite sex than of the same sex. one thing that does contribute to the problem is the prejudice that keeps gayness in the closet so that men feel the need to to prey on kids because they can't get gratification in their regular life. This doesnt excuse anyone nor does it even explain all cases but it is a hurdle we have to eliminate
2016-05-19 21:38:41 · answer #3 · answered by ? 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Who really cares if he shook it more than 3 times, he got caught plain and simple. And for those of you who design bathroom stalls and read Yahoo Answers, Why don't you make the partitions go all the way to the floor to begin with?
2007-09-26 18:08:12 · answer #4 · answered by acot_anthonym 4 · 4⤊ 1⤋
I don't care what he does in his sex life as long as he does what he's elected to do. I also think that the sting operation is a crock of sh!t, since there are children in every city being preyed upon by drug dealers and pedophiles. What about all of the unsolved murders and terrorist sleeper cells. C'mon, no one can tell me that this sting operation was anything more than a complete waste of resources.
2007-09-27 02:31:28 · answer #5 · answered by Sloan R 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Does it matter?
I mean it doesn't matter to me, but should it matter to the people he's trying to impress?
What does a man's sexual orientation really have to do with the policies he's promoting?
I personally don't care.
I feel sorry for him that he chose to represent a party that caters to a lot of people who do give a lot of importance to such trivial matters.
2007-09-26 17:08:15 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
He is not homosexual just like there are no homosexuals in Iran.
2007-09-26 18:15:32 · answer #7 · answered by Follow the money 7 · 5⤊ 0⤋
His sexuality is only an issue because he is a republican. If he were a democrat, the liberals would be celebrating his diversity.....
2007-09-26 17:11:19 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 5⤋
He's a Republican... nuff' said
2007-09-26 18:15:16 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 0⤋
He is bisexual, which if you ask me, is gay.
2007-09-26 22:40:37 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋