2007-09-26 16:50:36 · 20 answers · asked by Anonymous in Sports ➔ Cricket
of course it is didnt u watch the tv
2007-09-26 16:53:15 · answer #1 · answered by jason 2 · 0⤊ 2⤋
No bc, 20-20 takes every two years or 1 year not sure. The next 20-20 will be held in England, 2009.
A 50 ODI matches is something cricket fans been watching for centurys & present. I think a 50odi match is better bc, this is real cricket & not just 20 overs. A 50odi is a cricket match that counts bc, ICC World cup is a 50odi match. (Not including AusVSS.L.)
2007-09-26 18:36:48 · answer #2 · answered by Furioso Lion88 5 · 0⤊ 2⤋
NO I dont think of which would be a stable concept 50 overs and 20 over fits are 2 thoroughly distinctive varieties of interest nicely in point of fact each and all the international places are taking part in too a lot cricket at present and that i think of they'd desire to ease the schedules somewhat then amending the format of the interest as quickly as u have the 20/20 over side interest, the gamers wont get to tutor their skills cricket has continuously been an fairly long interest and having a short video games wont be a stable concept i think of followers will unfastened interest in the 20 over interest
2016-12-17 11:19:56 · answer #3 · answered by louthan 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
20-20 is just for entertainment of fans but ,Odis are still better for understanding a player's talent.
2007-09-26 18:55:18 · answer #4 · answered by monu 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No never!
The 50 over matches are better and these are matches that count. And where is India rated in the 1 day matches again, far below South Africa.
2007-09-26 23:16:12 · answer #5 · answered by Rahima Liverpool 4 life 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
T20 is faster and less time wasting, but quality of the game goes down here. You no longer need to be a great technical batsman in this format.
2007-09-26 18:28:34 · answer #6 · answered by maddy 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If you r interested in just THRASHING cricket......then T20 is a must to watch......
But sometimes you want the classics to take off.......for tht i say Test matches rock....
In b/w lies ODIs................so you get the taste of both.
2007-09-26 16:54:56 · answer #7 · answered by Syed Faizan Tariq 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
20-20 is fast food, 50-50 is refreshment, test is classic meal!
2007-09-27 00:27:33 · answer #8 · answered by jijo 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i suppose both of them are played differently and with players point of view both are totally diffrent.But a a spectator I think T20 is better as it saves time and has a lot of exitment in it.I will go with T20.but as a player bot are different styles of playing.
2007-09-26 18:11:18 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
i don't think so.50-50 is beeter than 20-20
2007-09-26 17:28:39 · answer #10 · answered by Jaspal C 1 · 0⤊ 1⤋
those who has time can enjoy 50 over or test.
but people who don't have time they like to watch twenty20 matches.
2007-09-26 18:26:11 · answer #11 · answered by sean paul 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋