I think it is too close to fifty-fifty to predict. No, I didn't watch, nor do I think it will make any difference. I'm pretty sure they were just singing to the choir. So far, neither side is that amazing except to people who have already made up their minds.
2007-09-26 16:21:35
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
This was the first Dem debate (other than the spanish one) that I didnt get to watch. Clinton wont get President. If she gets the nomination, you could almost bet all of your money a Republican will win. Edwards would have a better chance at winning. I think that the Senate will lose Dem seats and a Republican, even after Iraq, will win again. Why? They are steadfast, yet most of them arent bigoted. Romney could win a few liberal votes. Ginrich(spelling) has a steadfast Senate record and is halfway honorable. The Dem candidates are too politically correct. Until they get out of that phase, they will suffer. The Republicans speak their mind, even if that means they have to, OMG, offend someone. Corruption plagues both sides, so you cant say the Dems nor the Reps have a higher moral ground.
2007-09-26 16:18:02
·
answer #2
·
answered by Daniel 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
Unless Bush pulls a rabbit out of a hat, Hilary a sure bet. Between now and next November all sorts of things could upset the applecart.
2007-09-26 16:19:39
·
answer #3
·
answered by paul 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yeah, you went out on a limb....It's hard to say...if the election were held today only a handful of people would be prepared to make an accurate choice based on real knowledge of each canidate.
2007-09-26 16:14:26
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
I watched about 1/2 of it, and I have to agree with the criticism that Hilary is dodging questions too much. It's too bad because I like her and I feel this is going to hurt her.
Not sure who would win today.
2007-09-26 16:18:47
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
I want Clinton to be elected in the worst way. I want to see the American people devastated, punished, and ground into the ground. They are all terrorists, and deserve to meet their fate by the election of Hillary Clinton.
Osama Bin Laden,
Most Devoted Clinton Supporter
2007-09-26 16:16:05
·
answer #6
·
answered by buttfor2007 5
·
3⤊
2⤋
Ron Paul of course. And no, I did not see the debate. I was busy dreaming about a better America.
2007-09-26 16:19:16
·
answer #7
·
answered by JB 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
possibly, yet uncertain. She has an extremely extreme adverse score, which may well be complicated (yet not impossible) to triumph over in the final election. Her marketing campaign for the nomination has additionally taken some missteps. even though, her husband is an superb campaigner, and if she does get the Democratic nomination, it is plausible that her marketing campaign may well be waiting to triumph over the negatives.
2016-10-20 02:39:02
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I try to avoid politics as much as I can but I agree with you. People want a change after Bush and she was the first lady so shes got experience. And plus shes a familiar face, nobody knows/like any of the other canidates
2007-09-26 16:15:55
·
answer #9
·
answered by Reveille 3
·
1⤊
2⤋
You are way way out on that limb. I don't really know who it will be but I would say Hillary has a very poor chance of winning a nation-wide general election..........
2007-09-26 16:14:53
·
answer #10
·
answered by Brian 7
·
4⤊
1⤋