2007-09-26 11:40:56 · 18 answers · asked by Maxi Robespierre 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
I think placing people under house arrest is far better than invading a soverign state and killing up to a million people ans stealing their oil, dont you?
2007-09-26 12:30:31 · update #1
cyber commie been reading government papers onfictional Dictatorship
2007-09-26 18:28:27 · update #2
You do wonder don't you?
I think people like Bush and Blair are the most dangerous terrorists the world has ever seen...
They are going to leave us with a legacy of the intelligencia understanding those who wish to murder them, better than their understanding of their own leaders! For the first time in human history, these idiots will have created global political self hatred.
Right now...I understand why Mohammed Atta did what he did...I still hate it...but I understand it. I don't understand why Bush even bothers to breathe.
2007-09-26 11:51:21 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Yes-I might not agree with Bush's policy but even a stopped clock is correct twice a day. Aung San Suu Kyi and the monks need help from wherever they can get it. Aside from being repressive thugs, the Burmese generals are looting the country. Bush may not have much moral authority left, but he is still president of the United States and that still means a lot. When Bush has Cindy Sheehan shot and Hillary Clinton placed under house arrest, then he will be the equal of the Burmese generals. Till then, he should criticize away.
2007-09-26 11:56:47 · answer #2 · answered by michinoku2001 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
What qualification would you need? There is a lot more to Burmese oppression than just house arrest, the population have been systematically murdered, tortured and imprisoned for nothing at all, what the generals have done to the Karen people is much worse that Iraq. Systematic genocide really.
Bush is not my favourite person, but any leverage put on the Burmese Junta is OK by me.
2007-09-26 18:12:42 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Why no longer the guy is an @re !! 4 words weapons Of Mass Destruction - chanced on them yet?? He shouldn't additionally be in workplace. He gained on a technicality ! everybody knows Al Gore could have been president. answer me this - do you as an American think of your president is respected worldwide ? Or appeared on as a individual who will quickly be "out the door" and god bless the subsequent one!!? through fact he's not, he's appeared on as a buffoon ! somebody who's being led quite than foremost ! i'm no longer anti American I admire you as a u . s . and additionally as an best chum. Your President isn't a real representation of the folk of u.s. and thank god for that ! And getting back on your question - We additionally HAD an @rse top minister very like yourselves at contemporary who led this u . s . no longer basically right into a faux conflict fooling us all into questioning Iraq had WOMD yet has now make this u . s . aswell through fact the worldwide a greater risky place to stay. I agree Sadam had to bypass yet particularly with each and every of the secret centers strolling around MI6 SAS Black Ops etc somebody would have merely have been given him and his ilk bumped off without making hundreds of "extremest" Muslims hate us all ? that's a concern now like Northern eire replaced into years in the past. we are able to be there for years getting countless youthful infantrymen killed ! good question do no longer meen to offend you in my view yet our ex top minister and your now president will bypass down in background as conflict mongerers ! And that's all to do with Oil, money and power !! the place have been the the troops whilst the Milosovic (can no longer spell it) had concentration camps for prisoners interior the former Yugoslavia ? Nowhere through fact there replaced into no oil, political income or power on hand from it peace !!! .
2016-10-09 21:21:08 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Bush hasn't used force to end the anti-war movement, so, yeah, he's still as qualified as any other cynical politician to criticise the internal affairs of another nation that is using force to quash dissent.
2007-09-26 11:46:57 · answer #5 · answered by B.Kevorkian 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Please do not rush.Wait for your turn.Iraq,Iran and then only Burma.Sorry for the delay.
The recent massive Indo American Naval exercise at kolkatta,Indian Ocean seems a prelude in US intervention.The Navy and Military exercise recently conducted by India and USA was so massive and there was never such show of force by USA in the region in the past.
2007-09-26 18:00:15 · answer #6 · answered by leowin1948 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
What's happening in Burma, Darfur etc is terrible. What America and Britain etc has done to Iraq is unforgivable.
2007-09-27 02:21:02 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
President Bush is over-qualified to do such, er, stuff and things, pass the butter, Dad. What was the question ?
2007-09-26 11:49:50 · answer #8 · answered by David R 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Bush is not my choice. He has led us into too many problems that has cost many lives to perish. No, he must not say anything but get out of Iraq, NOW!!
2007-09-26 11:47:26 · answer #9 · answered by Mary C 1 · 1⤊ 0⤋
after Iraq when ever ....everyone is qualified to criticise Burma ..but its up to the Burmese to sort
2007-09-26 12:22:50 · answer #10 · answered by bobonumpty 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋