those are has-beens, but WWE(We Were Entertaining) fans don't call them has-beens yet when TNA signs a guy from WWE, he's a has-been or a WWE reject? Can WWE fans make some sense please?_____TNA IMPACT THURSDAY NIGHTS ON SPIKE 9/ET
2007-09-26 11:09:08 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous in Sports ➔ Wrestling
Jericho's in his prime? RVD's a has-been compared to Jericho? That makes no damn sense. I could care less if Jericho came to TNA, I don't want ex-WWE wrestlers in TNA trust me, they did fine with just the X Division, that's how they got noticed, not b/c of the Karen Angle crap.
2007-09-26 11:32:17 · update #1
why are people using VKM/Steiners? Didn't I see Dusty Rhodes wrestle Randy Orton a few PPVs ago? WWE fans would like it if VKM came back. I'd wish they'd leave TNA.
2007-09-26 16:23:05 · update #2
the guys that TNA hires are called has beens because nobody wants them back in the WWE. Once someone is not wanted back in the WWE, they are a has been, whether they sign with TNA or not.
Everyone still wants kurt angle in the WWE, so he is not referred to as a has been (or he shouldnt be)
Do you think a WWE crowd would go crazy for a video of rikishi or tomko or rhyno? of course not, but they go crazy for stone cold and jericho because they are not has beens....if TNA signed either of those 2 i would not call them has beens, and i doubt anyone would.
2007-09-26 12:07:58 · answer #1 · answered by JJets_3:16 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Stone Cold & Jericho are actually draws compared to guys like VKM & the Steiners, and although Austin can't wrestle due to injuries over his career, at least he's more popular than a lot of the ex-WWE guys TNA has signed. If TNA signs an ex-WWE guy that can draw or wrestle or both, then he won't be a has-been or a WWE reject, but so far the only thing close to not being a has-been is Sting.
2007-09-26 18:32:34 · answer #2 · answered by AmDrag5000 (dont stop believin) 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well it has to do alot with who TNA signs. VKM and the Steiner brothers are has beens, but they get more air time then younger wrestlers who actually deserve it. Jericho is still a big draw also.
2007-09-26 19:35:18 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Lol get real man! Has beens? Thats to harsh a word. TNA is ok but dont even compare to WWE..... They will be shut down soon to...Id put money on it.
2007-09-26 18:14:12 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
Umm because Jericho and Stone Cold arn't has-beens, if TNA signed those guys I wouldnt call them has-beens. But its TNA's fault for signing guys like Tyson Tomko, Ryno and Rikishi! Now those my friend are HAS-BEENS.
2007-09-26 18:13:08 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
Well, my friend, if you would rather watch Scott Steiner than Y2J, then you, my friend, better not call yourself a wrestling fan. Stick to high-spots and bad storylines. That is TNA(ngle).
2007-09-26 18:19:11 · answer #6 · answered by The Man of Steel 4 · 4⤊ 1⤋
No, offense but I didn't understand anything you just typed. It just looks like a bunch of letters strung together.
OK, Bob I know who you are now? Thumbs up! Sorry about that other comment.
2007-09-26 18:19:45 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
JERICHO IS IN HIS PRIME. SO WHO YOU CALLING A HASBEEN. RVD IS A HAS BEEN YET HES THE POSTER BOY FOR TNA.
OH YEAH I DIDNT HEAR YOU CALLING JERICHO A HASBEEN WHEN RUMORS SURFACED HE MIGHT GO TO TNA?
2007-09-26 18:19:37 · answer #8 · answered by BOB 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Your rambling on making little to no sense what so ever....I don't understand any question you poorly tried to explain...
2007-09-26 18:14:28 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋