I am a Democrat, so I am not bashing Hillary, but I do not think she should automatically be elected unless it is based on her own merit. I fear that too many Dems. are automatically voting for her because of her name and what they think BILL will do for our country.
2007-09-26 10:28:58 · 23 answers · asked by It is what it is 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
By the way, I am talking about the Democratic primary, not the general election, so spare me the I would never vote for a Dem. stuff...:)
2007-09-26 10:33:24 · update #1
Greg-care to clarify? You are not answering the question.
2007-09-26 10:40:03 · update #2
She would be an unknown if she were never married to Bill. The only reason she's popular now is that she is a Clinton. Have you noticed how in the past few years she has gone from being Hillary Rodham Clinton to just Hillary Clinton? She's playing the Clinton card. Bill's popular among Democrats, and she's capitalizing on his good name.
2007-09-26 10:53:54 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 2⤋
Hillary Clinton is a million times worse than Bill. I don't know why Bill stays married to her because Hillary is a lesbian. But I guess if Bill can have Monica Hillary can also. So it is a good marriage. Hillary is just a witch and baby killer with no morals or values. I don't like Bush either. Hope Ross Perot makes a comeback.
2007-09-26 11:55:19 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 2⤋
sure. it is totally sparkling to me that the only reason she did not divorce bill Clinton is as a results of the fact she is promoting her very own political time table. i for my area think of she needs revenge to be honest. i think of she has an awl to grind with bill and needs to grow to be President to not in basic terms fulfill her feminist thirst for power, yet so she would be able to additionally get "serviced" via a male intern interior the oval place of work and stick it up bill's @ss. We merely do not choose somebody with those form of intentions working the rustic. And we don't choose yet another Clinton relatives scandal popping out of the White abode, exceedingly in mild of the plenty extra significant subject concerns this united states of america needs to handle at present.
2016-12-28 04:21:45 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I''m 50 and after her deal with White Water, the theft of $28,000 of furniture from the White House not to mention trying to turn this country into the next Nazi Germany I think not. My girlfriend is a democrat and a liberal and even she says that Hillary sucks and being that she's a social worker, I have to believe her.
2007-09-26 11:19:10 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 2⤋
Hillary as well a W would not be where they are without their families connections. I voted for Bill twice, and do not regret my votes, but when Hillary allowed W to roll her over this war of choice, I left the Dem's, and will not be voting for her or any other Dem. Between the war and the Dem's lying down for LaRaza and such over the amnesty I am no longer a Dem
2007-09-26 10:34:41 · answer #5 · answered by jean 7 · 2⤊ 5⤋
It would have made no difference. Hillery is her own person, a natural-born leader, has a fine mind, and would do just as well as President without Bill, had that happened.
Bill will be a tremendous ASSET to her, however, just as all GOOD Presidents (unlike Bush) surround themselves with advisors who are valuable assets.
2007-09-27 02:07:37 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
I feel the opposite. If she was a single Mother, had worked thru her second term as Senator of New York, or longer, I would feel differently about her. Having Bill as an anchor is in my opinion is her downfall. He only helps himself. As he did as President. His "Giving" is all well and good while we wait for Hillary to put him back in the White House. It is calculated, planned and transparent. Atleast he's no longer obstructing justice but helping poor children and world humanities concerns. Why did he not do that as President? Alittle late perhaps?
Thank you.
*Newt & McCain in '08
2007-09-26 10:37:42 · answer #7 · answered by Mele Kai 6 · 2⤊ 3⤋
I could not vote for her at all. Her politics and platform are in direct conflict with mine.
I never liked the Clinton Administration.
The idea of a Madame President is appealing, but more along the lines of Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher, not Nanny Dearest.
2007-09-26 10:34:21 · answer #8 · answered by ZepherGeist 2 · 3⤊ 3⤋
They were a team when Bill was in office and would be again if Hillary gets the job. I would not vote for Hillary by herself.
2007-09-26 10:39:28 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 3⤋
I would never vote for Hillary..........her public record shows her to be a socialist.......and to take away our freedoms, one by one.......she is our Senator, and has done nothing of significance for our state in the six years she has been here. Furthermore, she promised New York voters that if they voted her into the Senate, she would not run for President, as her intentions were to fulfill her term in the Senate.......how can we trust that woman?
2007-09-26 10:50:32 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋