no
and yes to your 2nd question
It actually requires that one must suspend disbelief in order to believe anything that a Democrat says.
And in a broader sense you can substitute the word liberal for Democrat and then the same would apply to many liberal wolves in sheeps clothing in the Republican party as well.
2007-09-26 09:28:18
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Now just so you know, this what Colombia, Latin America and Asia is most concerned about. I don't know how the situation is in the US but here in Colombia this is what we've heard.
I want you to tell me if you've heard about, Skulls & Bones involving Bush and the Tomb in Yale University, Freemasons, Rockerfeller and now the Trilateral where Bill Clinton is. Bielderberg group involving an anual elite private secret meeting with the world's greatest leaders:(involving presidents, educators, press, government and royalty with only a list of 100 invitations to this elite group taking place in different parts of Europe). The twin towers and 9/11 was an inside demolition job. The secret societies involving both great World Wars, Religion, all the greatest discoveries and man creations. Like the atomic bomb & AIDS was a lab virus released by the American government testing gay prisoners. CIA cover ups, Bob Marley, John F Kennedy, 9/11 and many more, CFR (Council of Foreign Relations). Irak/N
2007-09-26 09:28:32
·
answer #2
·
answered by Daniel Rodd 2
·
0⤊
2⤋
The Dems tap into the middle class tax base to pay for their entitlement programs. Take Sen Clinton who states that she is against tax breaks for the rich, yet has voted three times to give herself and other rich people a tax break on capitol gains.
At some point the middle class better wise up and realize both parties are preying on them.
2007-09-26 09:29:17
·
answer #3
·
answered by mymadsky 6
·
2⤊
0⤋
There is a lot of both going on. You can usually tell who's who by looking into their backgrounds. A lot of these "little guys" were born wealthy, or are just greedy and corrupt.
Almost all politicians are guilty of hiding behind their party. Thats why the system has to go through a fundamental change.
2007-09-26 09:28:52
·
answer #4
·
answered by ☺☻☺☻☺☻ 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
The answer is no. At least Al Sharpton and Jessie Jackson must not think so. All Politicians get rich at the expense of the tax payer, and could care less about your problems.
2007-09-26 10:10:45
·
answer #5
·
answered by Johnny Reb 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
the cumulative little guy makes up the democratic party. just as the cumulative big guy makes up the republican party. when the republican party(e.g. the republicans in congress) pass legislation that is favorable to the big guy, what are they exploiting?
each party passes or attempts to pass legislation that is favorable to its constituents on a state or national level. this increases their power by gaining more followers and contributions for that particular party.
the democratic party cares as much about it constituents as the republican cares about theirs. i am sure that the republicans exploit their "big guy" causes in such a way as to gain the most power, prestige, and contributions as they can.
that is what the political games that they play in washington are all about. you may be trying to imply that the republican party was founded by mother teresa and everything that they do is based on some altruistic principle, but i do not think that is so.
2007-09-26 09:44:38
·
answer #6
·
answered by tomjohn2 4
·
0⤊
2⤋
He loves the little guy. He exploits his fears. He supplies him that he won't could hardship approximately his basic desires bc the government.will guard him. He makes the little guy experience better by way of punishing to wreck firms and those with money. He has to have the little guy to proceed to exist.
2016-10-05 09:59:47
·
answer #7
·
answered by beliveau 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
They care more about exploiting the "little guy" causes. As I have said previously the Democrats claim to be supporting minorities but those same issues that minorities thought would be resolved once the Dems are in office are thrown to the side until reelection time and whoa look out "here comes the rhetoric!
2007-09-26 09:26:28
·
answer #8
·
answered by kezsridg 2
·
4⤊
3⤋
Corporate America for many many years has rode the back of the "little guy" while fat-a$$ monkeys in suits sit behind a desk and collect the profits from labor that is not theirs.
The neo-con party, not the republican party, very seldom regulates these folks. So what do you think?
2007-09-26 09:27:46
·
answer #9
·
answered by trevor22in 4
·
2⤊
2⤋
No. Democrats blocked an African American man from speaking as an expert witness for congress. They didn't want him to say how illegal immigration is causing serious problems for the African American community.
Democrats politicians are more interested in keeping themselves in power by getting more votes from new voters(illegal aliens). Democrats politicians are afraid of the unemployment line.
Republicans set up a special committee to let the man speak. That upset Democrats.
2007-09-26 09:27:08
·
answer #10
·
answered by a bush family member 7
·
2⤊
2⤋