I must have missed this new law.
Here is a question asked on YA...
Why not offer Africa or poor countries birth control?
are they offered or allowed to take birth control or just have made the choice to have babies.why let the new borns suffer?
Here is an answer from a super intelligent liberal...
"Thanks to the Bush Administration, you can't do that. Abstinence only."
Is this a clear example of how liberal hatred towards our President has become so delusional that they think like this? They have actually lost the intellect to think on a rational basis. They have lost touch with reality and they now "make up" incidents that are mere figments of their imagination.
So, when did the Bush administration ban Birth Control?......
2007-09-26
09:16:46
·
21 answers
·
asked by
Mr. Perfect
5
in
Politics & Government
➔ Politics
My apologies... To all the liberals that prefer to think that I am labeling ALL liberals and can't comprehend that if they don't think this way... its not addressed to them.... I will clarify and say MANY liberals have this same mindset and irrational thought process. Obviously not all liberals go to these extremes.
It isn't hard people... Questions are asked in generalities in this forum because I will not address every individual on a personal basis. The question would get REALLY long. If you wish to comment... fine... if it doesn't apply to you, you should know you are not required to answer.
Feel better?
2007-09-26
09:47:59 ·
update #1
trevor... thanks for proving the point quite nicely. Yes.. this question somehow did involve the war in Iraq and Afgahnistan right... oh wiat... one of those liberal "figments of your imagination" things huh? Let's ask Alex for "reality" for a $1,000 shall we? Since you brought up killing people... and you appear to be against our children abstaining from sex until they are old enough, I am guessing you are OK with the millions of murders taking place in our country every year with the sholesale slaughter of innocent children in the form of abortion.
And yes.. IT IS RATIONAL to go and kill terrorists who have no value for human life. Who kill innocent people because they don't hold their beliefs. With your Iraq statement... (it is so bad that we are killing terrorists) you seem to be OK with the killings of our civilians on 9/11.... or do you think our troops aren't smart enough to know the difference between Iraq citizens and terrorists and that doesn't matter anyhow.....
2007-09-26
10:04:01 ·
update #2
since we are just over there to murder innocent Iraqi's no matter what they are. Are our troops murders as you have implied? If that is all we wanted... don't you think we have a few bombs that would do the trick? Try that thinking thing every now and again... It's good for you!
2007-09-26
10:06:42 ·
update #3
He never did. Clearly that person is confused between actual birth control for adults and giving it out to pre-teen kids in school......
2007-09-26 09:23:30
·
answer #1
·
answered by Brian 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
No my friend, YOU, have lost touch with reality.
I guess rational for you is invading Iraq and killing all the brown people right? Yes, I'll take no exit strategy for $1000 Alex.
The answer was probably more eluding to the fact that baby Bush has given millions of dollars in "Faith Based Initiatives" mostly if not entirely to protestant based religions. And as we all know, these folks have one thing in mind. To control you, scare you and manipulate you into believing that somewhere out there an invisible man is watching everything you do. Americans can no longer go against the grain because it is un-American and un-patriotic. Instead, if they do this, they are laden with guilt and fear of what the decider might do next.
2007-09-26 16:24:45
·
answer #2
·
answered by trevor22in 4
·
1⤊
1⤋
He never did. I, as a Republican, and believer in the right to life for babies, even for those who don't want their own children, believe in birth control. I say to those who use abortion as BIRTH CONTROL, or any who think that is a correct way to live their own lives, when those, like their own unborn babies, don't get that choice, should USE it! Abortionists can usually get it for FREE, if that's what they're afraid of, having to pay money to keep from getting pregnant? If I find it terribly hard, even almost impossible to forgive a person who so readily would murder their own child, from their own blood, I wonder how hard it must be for them to get God's forgiveness, since he played a hand in creating that child?
2007-09-26 17:22:22
·
answer #3
·
answered by xenypoo 7
·
2⤊
1⤋
Of coarse he is responsible for AIDS and the lack of birth control in Africa. Hes also responsible for foreign oil dependency, lower taxes than the Clinton years, the depleting ozone layer, (oh wait that concern is out of style) global cooling (I mean warming) wars that we lie to get into so can kill Muslims and steal oil and make oil execs more rich, Hurricanes, you name it! If there is an injustice in the world, its the Bush administrations fault and that will be the case for many years after hes gone. Dont you know that?
Whats irrational about that??
2007-09-26 17:22:46
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
They didn't ban it, he has said he will not support birth control (such as condoms) He is an advocate of abstinence only, and will not allow American aid money to be used for the purchase of these items. The money is earmarked for the "treatment" of aids infected people. The sad part is condoms reduce the possibility of spreading sexually transmitted disease. Which would reduce the need for treatment, and actually save American dollars.
BTW - Has nothing to do with Liberal bashing of Bush. It' the facts.
2007-09-26 16:28:54
·
answer #5
·
answered by Pat Fortam 2
·
2⤊
2⤋
If more liberal families would exercise birth control America would be a better place. The less of them in the gene pool the better.
The better question is why is'nt Bill Clinton helping out Africa...the Chineese named a condom after him right after the imeachment.
2007-09-26 16:21:00
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
2⤋
Bush decided to shift American relief funds to UNICEF for funding abstinence education. It worked, and in african nations that have greater spending on abstinence programs, AIDS rates are in retreat.
2007-09-26 16:24:06
·
answer #7
·
answered by lundstroms2004 6
·
2⤊
0⤋
About the same time Jesus became gay and our country became a boil on the buttocks of the world...
In other words...when the loony left stopped using discernment and just started spewing their hatred of everything Red White and Blue!
2007-09-26 16:44:57
·
answer #8
·
answered by Lilliput1212 4
·
0⤊
2⤋
They didn't ban birth control. They are pro-abstinence. They're not paying for condoms to be shipped.
2007-09-26 16:20:37
·
answer #9
·
answered by civil_av8r 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
He can't actually ban it, but their stance has been abstinence only, which is supposedly the Chistian way, but isn't the smartest way either. He promised to repeal RoeV Wade, & hasn't been able to yet, but he has made it much more difficult for a woman to take care of herself without him meddeling. Sick & I hope it ends soon.
2007-09-26 16:23:43
·
answer #10
·
answered by fairly smart 7
·
0⤊
1⤋