Why,either way?
2007-09-26 09:13:58 · 19 answers · asked by ? 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
My vote was nullified back in 2000 by the Supreme Court just like the rest of the millions of Americans who cast a vote. But the vote I did cast that wasn't counted, didn't vote for Bush. And, I didn't vote for him in 2004 either. And, I would never vote for that incompetent and his sociopath sidekick. I knew he was incompetent and Cheney was a sociopath in 2000 and they've proven me right ever since.
2007-09-26 09:27:00 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
"Are you kidding? I would've campaigned TWICE as hard for him if I had known what was going to happen...having Al Gore in office on 9/11 would have been a global tragedy. "
Why do you think that 9/11 is a good thing? Why would preventing it be a global tragedy? Why does knowing that Bush would allow 9/11 to occur increase your support from him?
I, and a lot of patriotic Americans, would like to know.
2007-09-26 09:26:28 · answer #2 · answered by buffytou 6 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Lol, I don't know actually. I wouldn't vote for the other guy because he didn't do some things right. And now that I know about Bush, I probably wouldn't vote for either. ^^; Idk....i'm a bit frustrated with the whole thing..
2007-09-26 09:17:51 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
I am very proud to say that I have never voted for a Bush! And, I have never missed an opportunity to vote! I knew going in he wasn't worth his weight in doodoo, I am surprised so many others didn't do any home work, just blindly vote for the worst candidate!
2007-09-26 09:20:08 · answer #4 · answered by fairly smart 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
For those who play the "lesser of two evils" game, what we knew then was that the Democrat alternatives were Gore in one case, and Kerry in another. I don't think those facts have changed over time. In fact, time has vindicated the preference.
Oh, and I voted for Harry Browne in 2000, and Badnarik in 2004.
I don't personally play "lesser of two evils", but I do recognize that those who do got it right the last two times.
2007-09-26 09:19:12 · answer #5 · answered by open4one 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Did not vote for him, but we have been under the control of big business for many years. Their desire is to take from the poor and give to the rich. We could be using water for fuel and have free electricity today except for the fact that big money and oil would not like that.
2007-09-26 09:29:36 · answer #6 · answered by Pey 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I know that even with all his mistakes and miscues, he's been a better president than Gore or Kerry could ever have been.
That's a yes.
2007-09-26 09:44:08 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Are you kidding? I would've campaigned TWICE as hard for him if I had known what was going to happen...having Al Gore in office on 9/11 would have been a global tragedy.
2007-09-26 09:19:00 · answer #8 · answered by makrothumeo2 4 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Never voted for him,
But then again, I am one of the 4% that votes in every election but does not vote for president.
I have never voted for a president in my life.
2007-09-26 09:19:32 · answer #9 · answered by lundstroms2004 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
With all of his faults, G W is still better than Kerry.
2007-09-26 10:32:08 · answer #10 · answered by mjmayer188 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋