After reading the best answer from this question, I had to ask you guy something: http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=AonZHEpbunl_eKUr2hpWbtBIzKIX;_ylv=3?qid=20070610144940AACuAlH
Do you think India should actually be seperated into two countries : North India and South India, with North India being modern day Bangladesh, Pakistan, and North India?
Think about it. South India's culture is so different from North India's. When it is time for India to unite, conflicts occur like the language and religions....
In my Opinion, Pakistan and Bangladesh were not nessecary to be created. They are so poor now. But if they united with the rest of Northern India, that wouldn't have beed a problem because the cities are bigger...
Anyways, I don't have time to right everthing I feel, I just want to know if anyone agrees with me. Please think about it and answer. Please no bad comment.
2007-09-26
08:50:53
·
5 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Society & Culture
➔ Other - Society & Culture
To a well wisher, my point is that if India becomes a grand nation, India can not be united very easily because of so many cultures. My original idea about India was for it to be the entire sub-continent, but then I realized it is hard for all of India to unite. It is even hard for modern India to unite, hence my question: North India vs. South India.
2007-09-26
09:06:43 ·
update #1