2007-09-26 06:54:16 · 9 answers · asked by samdmunsen 1 in Sports ➔ Fantasy Sports
no
Your down grading BIG time if you take that trade ... yes Romo is a nice QB ... but Rudi is a great running back and is doing fine this season ... Schaub will have a nice game against Atlanta and make them wish they never traded him away ...
Good Luck
2007-09-26 07:04:20 · answer #1 · answered by TC 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Whoever ends up with Romo in that trade loses. You can't give up a top-end running back for a QB. The difference between Romo and Schaub is nothing compared the the difference between Rudi Johnson and a waiver wire back.
2007-09-26 14:06:16 · answer #2 · answered by Mr. Taco 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Nah.. When you break it down it's a Good QB (Schaub) and a Great back (Johnson) being traded for a Good/Great QB in Romo.. the team giving up Romo needs to at least have a 2nd tier running back involved to make it fair..
2007-09-26 14:01:39 · answer #3 · answered by Game Over 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No. Romo is having a monster season, but you can't give up Rudi and the suprisingly good Schaub. Rudi does have a hamstring injury and may miss Monday Night, but I would keep your team as is, unless you are the one getting Rudi and Schaub.
2007-09-26 13:58:35 · answer #4 · answered by Casual Traveler 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It really depends on depth of the teams involved. If Schaub is his starting qb and best one he has but he has a bunch of good to great backs then yes its a fair trade. Trades are made as a benefit to both teams involved the names may look like its unfair but if it helps out both teams then its fair. Its hard to say yes or no without knowing the depth of the teams involved
2007-09-26 14:03:48 · answer #5 · answered by topbetter1979 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The way Romo is playing now it is definately a fair trade. Would i make the trade, Probably not!!!
2007-09-26 14:54:22 · answer #6 · answered by Kevin 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Keep Johnson and Schaub. Don't give up two for one.
2007-09-30 11:01:37 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
no you should get somebody else in the trade
2007-09-26 14:01:49 · answer #8 · answered by Brad B 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
hell no....
2007-09-26 15:01:19 · answer #9 · answered by Tucker C 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋