2007-09-26 02:02:07 · 15 answers · asked by ClKyHa 1 in Sports ➔ Baseball
i believe he should continue to play for as long as he feels he can contribute to a team winning...but its his decision not mine..just an opinion.
2007-09-26 02:10:47 · answer #1 · answered by storeetjdjay 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
100% chance that he WON'T retire. Here's why: 1) He only 80 some hits from 3000. And he's very close. 2) He's #2 in career RBIs. Hank Aaron is only about 70 or 80 ahead of him. 3) Bonds already said that he isn't going to retire.
2016-05-18 23:59:54 · answer #2 · answered by anthony 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
He may be forced into retirement. He won't be able to play LF anymore so he'll need to go to the AL. Not many teams would be interested because of the controversy surrounding Bonds. Maybe another bay area team like the Angels but that's about it. People keep throwing around Boston or New York but if you ask me these are the least likely teams to be interested.
2007-09-26 02:37:05 · answer #3 · answered by Jerbson 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think he should retire he's not playing the game for the reason he started anymore. It's all about getting as many stats as he can before he leaves. Someone else will eventually pass it and, with all the accusations about steroids he won't be able to enjoy these records. I think he should be humble and retire. Baseball is all about getting your team to the World Series. He doesn't even care about that he's in love with numbers, that's crap.
2007-09-26 02:28:10 · answer #4 · answered by Drift Shadow 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No. I think he will try to continue his record for 1-2 seasons and retire.
2007-09-26 02:08:11 · answer #5 · answered by ? 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
He should of retired 3 years ago
2007-09-29 13:30:41 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I agree that he should retire. He has his record*, and there is nothing left for him to achieve other than winning a WS. But his presence will continue to be a reminder of the steroid era and a distraction to the game.
2007-09-26 05:51:51 · answer #7 · answered by frenchy62 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I would recommend it. What's left for him to achieve, other than more embarassment. He'll be 42 yrs old with an failing body and a continuation of steroids conversations from park to park. It's time to fade into the records book and Hall of Fame.
2007-09-26 02:11:25 · answer #8 · answered by solomonfever 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Well i think he should but in this time of baseball you want to make a record unreachable. But Barry's case i think he's trying to push that record farther. See today in baseball inorder to be remembered you have to break records.
2007-09-26 02:09:36 · answer #9 · answered by Jr. m 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I feel this is why the Designated Hitter was created. This will enable him to do what he is good at. If I was a GM and we could afford it cap wise I would secure him right away. He will pay dividends anywhere he goes.
2007-09-26 04:29:17 · answer #10 · answered by Billy Cooke 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋