George W. Bush said today that he thought that Hillary Clinton would win the Democratic nomination. DO you think he's trying to sabotage her? Since nearly everything that he has said since he became president has turned out to be wrong, do you think he's betting on his crappy credibility to torpedo her chances?
2007-09-24 15:24:35 · 12 answers · asked by Concerned Citizen 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
I thought that no one cared what he said any more, how could he hurt her?
2007-09-24 15:34:22 · answer #1 · answered by hmm 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋
President Bush has always spoken respectful of her, and has had many kind words to say about her, but the same doesn't go for the other side.
Hillary will sabotage herself with her big loud in your face mouth. She's hateful and cold and people are already sick of seeing her. She's been around too long already. Having her as president means having Bill Clinton back also, were tired of that.
She cant stay off her period long enough to make rational decisions. God help us if she gets in!.
2007-09-24 15:34:58 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
"Concerned Citizen" You got to be kidding? Sounds like your more concerned about the outcome of the 08' election, than Hillary "Rotten" Clinton winning the Democratic ticket on some credibility?? You wouldn't discern leadership if it hit you in the face riding on a Mac truck.
2007-09-24 16:07:35 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
I think he most definitely is. It's the one thing his base dreads more than anything else, and making it seem as though she's got the nomination on lockdown will jump start the grassroots network.
We can't stand another four years of this brand of Republican extremism and incompetence. King George isn't the only incompetent one, he's just the worst. As demonic as Hillary might seem because of the 15-year smear campaign leveled against her by right-wing talk radio, she'd be infinitely better than more Republican government if even half the outrageous allegations against her were true.
2007-09-24 15:50:49 · answer #4 · answered by Whoosh 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
No, because even though he's always wrong, he firmly believes that he is right.
To be honest I think that the Clintons and the Bushes are really on the same side of things, they are just saying all the things they need to say to their target audiences and are keeping their real agenda as quiet as possible.
My vote goes to Ron Paul and his proven track record of supporting all the things he has said he supported and opposing all the things he said he was opposed to. Not to mention the fact that he has never even tried to dodge any issue and speaks plainly on all of his views.
I may disagree with him on many things but that is secondary to the fact that he at least can be trusted.
2007-09-24 15:38:11 · answer #5 · answered by Drixnot 7 · 3⤊ 1⤋
No. He really wants her to win, so he can have a connection in the White House. She will be worse than him. She wants his connections to wealth. Halliburton will stay on course and the war will be business as usual. Read between the lines, they have already talked. There is the conspiracy she talks about.
2007-09-24 15:35:56 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Hillary is doing a fine job of that herself.
2007-09-24 15:32:14 · answer #7 · answered by Coach K 4 · 3⤊ 1⤋
I would hope so. She is who we have to beat to keep socialism at bay.
2007-09-24 15:51:18 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
why? do u really think that she will not be the one they pick -- all he is doing is tellin the trurth (again)
2007-09-25 02:27:42 · answer #9 · answered by de viking 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
No, he's probably sabotaging the rest of us.
2007-09-24 15:41:56 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋