men were pregnant with the babies instead of women?
2007-09-24 14:58:08 · 37 answers · asked by darksideofthemoon 5 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Polls & Surveys
Why the heck would I make my elbow licking up? Pics in my profile...
2007-09-24 15:10:42 · update #1
God I hate how close minded people are sometimes. I'm double jointed.
2007-09-24 15:11:27 · update #2
You would have to guess if a man had a beer belly or was pregnant. lol
2007-09-24 15:01:09 · answer #1 · answered by throw_away_your_television_2 6 · 4⤊ 0⤋
In answer to your question, there's a funny list of ways the world would be different if men got pregnant instead of women, here:
http://www.getamused.com/jokes/018560.html
For further reading, check out:
http://ateros.com/pregnantmen/
"A site dedicated to everything related to the idea of men being pregnant."
But seriously: I think abortion would be fully legal and very accessible, and that the birth control pill would be available as an over-the-counter medication, just like Aspirin or Tylenol; and both of these in every country in every part of the world. Not because men WOULDN'T WANT to become pregnant, just because they would demand complete control and discretion over their reproductive abilities. In many parts of the world today, accessibility of either abortion and / or contraceptive pills is limited for women presently.
Hope those will shed some light on your question!
2007-09-24 15:19:13 · answer #2 · answered by Madame Morticia 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Our world would probably be ending, because I bet no man would want to bear with periods, menopause and of course the actual giving birth. Most of them can't even deal with hearing about these things. On the other hand, it could be the opposite, because so many men take advantage of girls, getting them pregnant, that the world could become overpopulated like China. It's a weird thing to think about..but I think it's okay the way it is.
2007-09-24 15:03:39 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
So the men were like women & the women were like men?
Hahahaha hilarious!
Well, the women would be more perverted, I guess.
And the men will understand the pain we go through in child birth.
By the way, would they have a fat stomach or be pregnant?
2007-09-24 15:04:07 · answer #4 · answered by =^.^= 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The men would experience the pain of women giving birth
2007-09-24 15:00:45 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
The level of reproduction would be wwwaaayyyy down. I work with 8 men and you'd think that they were dying when they have a cold. I can't imagine what it would be like if they got knocked up.
2007-09-24 15:08:34 · answer #6 · answered by Jayna 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes.
It would mean that men had babies instead of women.
Men would have vaginas and women would have penises.
Men would be known as "bitches" by women and women would be referred to as a**holes by men.
Nothing would change other than the names.
(I know this is not the answer you were looking for)
2007-09-24 15:10:37 · answer #7 · answered by I am, I said 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Then men would be women. We would be nothing like we are now. We would be exactly like women. Rather to say women are women because they get pregnant and carry the child.
2007-09-24 15:01:08 · answer #8 · answered by beatlemaniac 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
There would be women would be presidents and country leaders, CEOs, and military generals and sergeants while men would be home complaining that women never listen to them.
2007-09-24 15:02:21 · answer #9 · answered by AAA 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
More complaining.
btw, To the person above me: it's not impossible to lick your elbow. My best friend can do it.
2007-09-24 15:00:18 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
We wouldn't last long, a baby will NOT fit through a male urethra. It would totally bust through the male genitalia.
2007-09-24 15:01:11 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋