Can someone give me a normal explanation on Bohr's Model?

Question

Its so stupid and all the definitons give you big fancy explanations. Thanks

Answer 1

Your confusion is the result of taking the model more seriously than it was intended. It was only suppose to be suggestive of the hypothesis at the time that particles are represented by a wave with wavelength inversely proportional to momentum and energy proportional to frequency, as suggested by the photoelectric effect. It predates development of an appropriate wave equation, so Bohr literally imagined little wiggly lines drawn around the nucleus. That's why it's called a model instead of a proper theory. The amazing thing about it was that it worked so well for hydrogen-like atoms.

Answer 2

nicely... you have one definite and one no. the real answer relies upon on the way you define "needless to say". Any atoms with a temperature above absolute 0 has warmth and, for this reason, is radiating thermal potential. If the atoms are at consistent temperature, the quantity potential radiating out is comparable to the quantity of potential radiating in from our surroundings. If a "organic" radioactive isotope decays, that experience creates EM waves that radiation out. If an atom has been eager about ability of something so as that an electron has been raised to an greater advantageous state, that electron will radiate EM wave whilst it returns to that's floor state (potential will = one quanta it incredibly is function for that element and that potential exchange). you are able to truly see this ensue in case you have a baby's toy it incredibly is "glow at nighttime" simply by fact in the back of schedule phosphorescence is the radiation of seen mild and that's "in the back of schedule" simply by fact it takes some time for excited electrons to"pick" to return to their floor state. yet... so a strategies as electrons constantly radiating EM waves simply by their "orbiting" around the electron, it does no longer paintings this manner. This analogy of an electron being like a planet orbiting the solar or a tether ball swinging around a pole isn't possibly a correct thank you to understand electrons.

Answer 3

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bohr_model
http://csep10.phys.utk.edu/astr162/lect/light/bohr.html
http://csep10.phys.utk.edu/astr162/lect/light/bohr.html

These are relatively understandable sites. You need to understand that each will be a bit complex, because the Bohr Model is a semi-complex scientific organizational chart.