for best player & most valuable player? Why or why not?
2007-09-24 14:32:34 · 5 answers · asked by Isis 4 in Sports ➔ Baseball
I don't think so, since it would the value of either award would be deflated. By definition, the MVP should be the best player.
2007-09-24 14:37:59 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Sure. I've advocated it for years. Pitchers could win the MVP, so might an older, cagey player who creates the chemistry to win, or the guy with the big numbers. Why not give the big numbers guy the Best Player Award, and THEN look at MVP.
2007-09-24 21:41:08 · answer #2 · answered by Sarrafzedehkhoee 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
No.
Geez looeze, folks, 75% of the entertainment value of the MVPs are the blood-flecked, mouth-foaming debates! Give that up? NEVER!
2007-09-24 21:41:20 · answer #3 · answered by Chipmaker Authentic 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
YES. The best player in baseball is not necessary the most valueable player..
2007-09-24 21:40:28 · answer #4 · answered by DJT28 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
yes, because the nl sucks
2007-09-24 21:38:18 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 3⤋