2007-09-24 13:41:48 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
I'm not against violence. Who said that? I'm fully in favor of violence against those who deserve it. The only part where we differ is:
Ahmadinejad think innocent people deserve violence.
I think violence should be reserved for terrorists and/or criminals
2007-09-24 13:46:08 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 3⤋
Just curious (I actually don't know this answer), but what actual violence has Ahmadinejad been responsible for for him to be labeled a serial killer?
2007-09-24 20:57:01 · answer #2 · answered by Jumbo Baby 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
For the same reason I would have wanted hitler to die in 1935. Before he started a war that killed 20 million people.
2007-09-24 20:47:49 · answer #3 · answered by smsmith500 7 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Who does? Try not to put everybody in one category just because you hear one or a group of people say something.
2007-09-24 20:44:41 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
Do you apply the same senseless logic to serial killers?
Jumbo Baby its a metaphoric statement. Stay outta the deep end its apparent you can't swim.
2007-09-24 20:49:46 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
Kill one, save a million or more. Sounds like a good trade off to me, so sure I guess I don't mind being a hypocrite.
2007-09-24 20:45:53 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 3⤋
Wow! I suppose it is hypocritical in your entitled little "nobody is bad", "just leave everybody alone and they'll leave you alone", "who am I to judge" little pea brain that has absolutlely no appreciation for the freedoms you squander.
2007-09-24 20:48:02 · answer #7 · answered by KRR 4 · 3⤊ 2⤋
Not at all.
It is sensible to take out a serial killer in order to prevent further killings.
That's just basic logic.
2007-09-24 20:47:59 · answer #8 · answered by gcbtrading 7 · 3⤊ 2⤋
No. Would it have been wrong to kill Hitler if we had known what he would do?
2007-09-24 20:55:12 · answer #9 · answered by reaganite27 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋