NASA sends astronauts in orbit to space stations and satellites but when will they send men BACK to the MOON? You'd think that with this being the NEW MILLENIUM, they'd already been there and done that and going back for more! Looks like our Sci-Fi movies and adventures have all proven to be FLUKES.
2007-09-24 13:32:30 · 6 answers · asked by Delores B 1 in Science & Mathematics ➔ Astronomy & Space
when they stop trying to kill each other, while wearing dipers, and drinking before a lift-off.
thats when
2007-09-24 13:40:06 · answer #1 · answered by ? 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
a million) particular, we actually did land on the moon. all the conspiracy theories that the landing become faked are promoted with the aid of people who do not quite comprehend their technological expertise. They see in basic terms a splash preparation that doesn't make experience to them for my area and don't have the technical background and intensity to totally clarify what they see. so as that they assume that the entire factor become faked. 2) NASA is stable now making plans to return to the moon. Contracts have been provided to agencies to layout the group motor vehicle, launch motor vehicle, etc. Google NASA for the entire tale. 3) Why we've not back to the moon faster?? - $$$$$$$. NASA has been exploring area non give up using robotic missions - an excellent purchase extra cost-effective and much less volatile than launching human beings on prolonged missions previous earth orbit. The manned software has persisted with return and forth and international area Station (ISS) missions.
2016-11-06 07:06:30 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
So many people are completely unaware of the current plans to return men to the moon by around 2020 and start building a permanent base there. It's not just a maybe or something, NASA is actually planning to do this with the new Orion CEV they are designing.
2007-09-24 14:00:57 · answer #3 · answered by Arkalius 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
we already sent men to the moon a few times now. NASA is now working on sending people to Mars, within the next ten years. So by 2017, the USA will have had the first human on mars
2007-09-24 13:55:44 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Hello Delores...
I cannot really think of any good reason for NASA to spend the billions of dollars it might cost to send a repeat mission to the Moon. There has to be a Cost-Benefit relationship. At this time there doesn't seem to be any "Benefit."
2007-09-24 13:57:00 · answer #5 · answered by zahbudar 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
When they have the budget. As far as i know NASA is concentrating on other projects like Mars (especially) and beyond.
2007-09-24 13:41:01 · answer #6 · answered by Nijuu 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋