No other statement he made elicited anger? Sounds sad doesn't it?
2007-09-24 12:54:54 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Government
Babe - I think that's the Columbia students motto!
2007-09-24 13:00:15 · update #1
You can be against the US, but don't you be homophobes.
2007-09-24 12:58:55 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
Ahmadinejad has a way of twisting his answers to hide the truth. His statement that were no homosexuals in Iran is probably true and was his "safe" answer. But but he conveniently leaves out the probable reason why. They've all been stoned to death.
2007-09-24 23:53:46 · answer #2 · answered by A C 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Yeah it's alright that he openly denies the holocaust, rails for the destruction of Israel, sponsors terrorism, continues a nuclear program that even France is against, and treats women as second class citizens. Maybe the "Queer Eye For The Straight Guy" gang needs to visit him and help him out with a makeover. His choice of clothing as a president of a country is terrible.
2007-09-24 20:11:33 · answer #3 · answered by enzfan82 2 · 4⤊ 0⤋
Muslims murder homosexuals through legislative process. Kill all the homosexuals and you have none in the country. It is against their law to be homosexual. Amerika would be the same way if it were allowed to be so. Ahmadinejad is no different than any other whack job in this country. Don't let the man fool you. He is extremely dangerous. On a side note: I find it completely impossible that the US had no idea Iran had been pursuing nuclear bombs when I had heard of it since the Air Force days back in 1975, through the news media, when Iran was our allie. We taught them to pilot the jets we sold them and now we act as if it is a total surprise they seek to turn the technology against us. I have been telling people since 1975 that Iran was the evilest country in the mid east. I guess it is the amerikan way to go after countries that have little means of defense these days instead of venturing to solve the correct problems.
2007-09-24 20:21:24 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 4⤋
They laughed very loudly at that statement, which, in my opinion, was the proper reaction. I don't think he should have been allowed to speak in the US, period. He should have been brought to a hotel and kept there until his speech at the UN. He should have never been allowed to roam freely in our country. To me, that is more sad than anything he said and the reactions he did or did not get.
2007-09-24 20:56:02 · answer #5 · answered by The Nana of Nana's 7 · 4⤊ 0⤋
Well what do you expect when you insult every single student at the university. By not including them as humans in your home country Fascist IRAN
2007-09-24 20:18:28 · answer #6 · answered by F yahoo in Ash 3 · 0⤊ 2⤋
gee whizzzzzzzzzzzz what a surprise! too bad ahma dini jack off did not elaborate how he got rid of the gays! so where was the gay lobby protesting this little prick???????? you spineless pus*sie*s....
2007-09-24 20:29:24 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
a good question,this whole event is a just queer situation
2007-09-24 20:08:05 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 0⤋
because it like most schools are very liberal and most gay people are liberal
2007-09-24 20:14:11 · answer #9 · answered by Rusty Shackelferd 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋