2007-09-24 11:42:32 · 18 answers · asked by Zay Bones 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Oh yes, he should. How dare he do that to his own country.
He was responsible for killing thousands of people and then sent another thousand over to their deaths in Iraq.
They are all corrupt, and I really can't understand why people cannot see it..and not many people here will either so I am facing a grilling for my answer just as you face a grilling for your question.
Yes. He Should.
2007-09-24 12:23:23 · answer #1 · answered by Black Star Deceiver 6 · 7⤊ 2⤋
Which one ?
Bush Sr. was involved more than his brat of a son.
Bush Sr. was also in Dallas when JFK was shot.
Bush Sr. was recruited and trained by the CIA in the mid 1950s to recruit and train terrorists to invade another sovereign country (Cuba).
Bush Sr. has the family relationship with the Bin-Laden family as well as the financial relationship.
Bush Sr. is a frustrated loser. If the Warren Commission Report wasn't so easy to cover up the facts the way the 9/11 Commission Report tried too. 9/11 never would have been planned.
Bush Sr. had made to many promises to more powerful people than the Bush family and to much money had been spent prewriting legislation and customizing the aircraft that hit the towers and planting the explosives that they needed George W Bush in the White House to ensure things would go their way.
That's where the Coup of the 2000 presidential election came into play. Having George W Bush lose was unacceptable and thus the Bush Sr. leaned on some of the Judges that should have, and were really required to, recuse themselves but they did not. The final 5-4 vote included a Judge that had been appointed by Bush Sr when he was President and another who Bush Sr. made sure was well rewarded afterward.
The US Supreme Court gave the Bush crime family the US government and the power that went with it and they have been the real extremists terrorists trying to force "Globalization" of the world as their agenda.
The US Constitution and Bill Of Rights have been eroded and taken away by these war criminals. assassins, terrorists, liars and killers.
The Miller Center of Public Affairs of the University of Virginia has a web page called "American President: An online Reference Resource".
It divides the US 200+ year history into 8 categories, listing the US Presidents who were in office during those periods.
Although you will only see 6 categories when you scroll down the page from the link below, you will find the fourth and eighth category by moving the bar at the bottom of the page to the left.
The 8th Category is labeled "Globalization (1989- )".
The Presidents listed are "George H. W. Bush, Bill Clinton, George W. Bush".
Hitler wanted to rule the world.
Are these presidents any different ?
2007-09-26 00:10:35 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
Of course that whole gang of satanic criminals should be tried, but will they? No. The rats leaving the ship a few months ago left while the going was good. But they will turn up doing other dirty deeds soon enough.
He will continue to thumb his nose to the world, swollen in the hubris that accompanies full belief in the false belief that you are god's chosen administrator of death upon the planet.
He was bred to this task. He won't pay. His kind rarely do. Atonement will come though. And it won't be pretty. It never is when the guilt catches up to you.
OMG NOW I am scared. The responses you got to this question are terrifying in their anger and ignorance. A question and you are a traitor, a dolt, should be shot, good gravy what happened to America?
This mindset is the real enemy. Just as much as the fools they support .. and the politics as well because they have no idea what is being done to them.
2007-09-25 06:07:21 · answer #3 · answered by Noor al Haqiqa 6 · 3⤊ 2⤋
Maybe not for orchestrating it, but for having prior knowledge and doing nothing about it. BushFraud is treasonous for signing on to the North American Union and not upholding the constitution.
2007-09-25 09:12:40 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
Only if we first posthumously indict Lyndon Johnson for ordering the hit on JFK.
2007-09-24 18:47:56 · answer #5 · answered by Mathsorcerer 7 · 3⤊ 2⤋
No.
However, since you're acusing the President of the United States of murder and treason, do you have any real proof that he did it, besides internet movies?
2007-09-24 19:08:49 · answer #6 · answered by J 5 · 2⤊ 6⤋
Absolutely.
2007-09-24 18:46:28 · answer #7 · answered by John 6 · 5⤊ 5⤋
You say that like you "Know" it's true. You don't know anything of the sort. If you are ever arrested, I hope you get a jury or judge who knows you did it, no matter what the evidence is.
2007-09-24 21:55:20 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 6⤋
Give me a break..Bush had nothing to do with 911..If anyone should be tried for treason it may be you for asking such a question...You are not American..
2007-09-24 18:47:07 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 8⤋
Where's the proof commy? You commucrats always accuse and never have any proof. You do realize that proof is what you convict with. That's how Monica's boyfriend was found guilty, remember the blue dress?
2007-09-24 18:48:27 · answer #10 · answered by citizenvnfla 4 · 4⤊ 8⤋