Only those who have supported the war. Each person who has supported the war should pay their portion depending on how many years, months, days etc that they have done so. If they were for it at first and then changed their minds they should be billed only for that period of support. Those supporting it after the start should do the same. For those opposed from the beginning they should not be charged anything.
2007-09-24 11:38:35
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
5⤋
I'd like to know who would pay America back if we had a coward like Kerry/Gore or a traitor like you, who would NEVER EVER defend the USA and had several re-occurrences of 911 because the terrorists know that a democratic administration would do nothing but talk, talk and talk BUT never defend the USA, regardless of the circumstances.
So, Bush made a mistake going into Iraq! SO, your false logic would have us believe because your ideology opposed anything Bush did, right or wrong, because Iraq has gone badly, socialism is validated. All the socialist bile and lies, are now true? Hah!
Reading your question, it's obvious that you are a socialist and are trying to manipulate other liberals to buy into your socialist rant.
Here's the real question- If socialism is so great, why do you have to trick people into accepting it?
2007-09-24 11:46:51
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
simply by fact the massive Lie is between the three Pillars of the conservs. The others are The purple Herring, and The Scapegoat. there became the massive Lie of the Tonkin Gulf assaults 1964 by ability of N. Vietnam that the conservs used to panic Congress into the massive escalation of the Nam war. 50,000 GI's killed, many greater maimed and "basically" wounded. Then there are the Vietnamese, yet who's counting them? Then the massive Lie of Saddam's WMD. 4420 GI's killed. Then they'r Iraqis, and troops of alternative countries.
2016-10-09 18:56:54
·
answer #3
·
answered by barbary 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
You actually do liberals a great disservice by echoing phrases and words such as "lie-based war," "quagmire" and so forth - there is simply no valid or verifiable evidence - just op-blogs and far left web sites to support this rhetoric.
For instance, if you have any verifiable evidence that President Bush lied - I recommend you contact your nearest democratic representative and I'm absolutely positive that your greatest desires will be full filled - impeachment proceedings will begin immediately.
2007-09-24 11:48:07
·
answer #4
·
answered by LeAnne 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
Wow, no biased, prejudicial assumptions in that question, is there?
Aren't you the same fool who would be wanting Bush's head on a platter for not stopping it if another 9/11 happened?
2007-09-24 11:42:30
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
The conspiracy theorist
How about we use the oil the libs say we are stealing
The tankers are loaded and ready with lib oil heading to New York Harbor
2007-09-24 11:40:03
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
I will pay from my tax dollars
2007-09-24 11:44:03
·
answer #7
·
answered by spider 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
I think that Bush should pay for it. It would teach him a lesson. I think that they should garnishee his wages until it's paid for.
2007-09-24 11:49:48
·
answer #8
·
answered by John 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
The republican and Democrats that voted for it and approved it. By the way Iraq is not a war.It is a conflict,
2007-09-24 11:39:52
·
answer #9
·
answered by ♥ Mel 7
·
1⤊
2⤋
Leftist democrats should pay for it. After all, they're generally the ones who spend all the money and tell all of the lies!
2007-09-24 11:39:31
·
answer #10
·
answered by bucksbowlbound 3
·
5⤊
2⤋