Apart from the fact they is no oil in Zimbabwe, so the rest of the world seem quite happy to sit back and pretend every is fine
2007-09-24 10:33:50 · 11 answers · asked by jo k 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
The big problem is that in spite of this tyrants record as leader.When the going gets tough the other African states side with Mugabi.Isnt it the same with Iran cuddling up to Iraq they fought each other for 5 yrs and now friends once more.It is human nature that takes over Muslims will side with Muslims.British with British and Americans with Americans etc..On humanitarian grounds the UN should now go into Zimbabwe and assist these desperate people.Mugabe is the elected President and his removal is down to the people of Zimbabwe.But getting other African States to agree to his removal is another matter.
2007-09-24 14:12:47 · answer #1 · answered by realdolby 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well Jo k
mugabe has no oil, so no need to kill him in the guise of saveing his people. no oil they dont care what happens. the less mouths to feed the better as far as they are concerned
all the leadersyou mention are no better than MUGABE
2007-09-24 10:44:12 · answer #2 · answered by IHATETHEEUSKI 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Mugabe is a Commie. He has the full protection of the Democrat Party. Will never be deposed because of that protection.
2007-09-24 10:38:41 · answer #3 · answered by buttfor2007 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Who elected you as World Policeman..No matter how much you dislike R Mugabe,Zimbabwe is a sovereign state..Nations must sort out their own destiny..Besides you cannot go about invading sovereign states,that you dislike..
2007-09-24 10:52:09 · answer #4 · answered by yaboo 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Mugabe's country doesn't have any petroleum and, furthermore, he was educated in Britain (it's the Old Tool Sky syndrome)
2007-09-24 10:41:30 · answer #5 · answered by captbullshot 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
maybe when the people of zimbabwe
wake up then change will occur
until then , more of the same
2007-09-24 10:37:53 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
dont be silly there aint no oil in Zimbabwe
2007-09-24 10:44:05 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
even if they had done that, the left would still be saying the same things minus the oil.
there's a saying that applies to a lot of african leaders... "meet the new boss, same as the old boss."
2007-09-24 10:36:19 · answer #8 · answered by civil_av8r 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Because the west see it as an 'African' problem I think, and are waiting for the African nations to do something which of course they wont
2007-09-24 10:55:07 · answer #9 · answered by angela m 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You said it, no oil there
2007-09-24 10:38:05 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋