English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

from what i know it was on fire and just sorta fell down. i dont think their was any structure damage to it but i could be wrong.

2007-09-24 10:15:23 · 7 answers · asked by SHELLTOE BISCUITS 3 in News & Events Media & Journalism

building 7 wasnt one of the 2 towers. it was another building in the area that just sorta fell down from fire damage. which has never happend before in a building of its type. once again not one of the two towers that got hit by the planes

2007-09-24 10:25:48 · update #1

jet fuel burns at 1500 degree's and steel melts at 2000

2007-09-24 10:34:52 · update #2

7 answers

Almost all the video & still shots of WTC 7 were taken from the north side of the building. The area on the south side, which faced the towers, had been evacuated for safety reasons. Very few shots were taken from that side, but those few pix show extensive damage over about 20 floors caused when large portions of the south (?) tower struck the south face of #7. The other 4 buildings were also destroyed by falling debris & fire, though none of them collapsed - probably because they were concrete beam supported. As mentioned by others, thousands of gallons of diesel fuel were also stored in #7. Those pictures also show extensive fire & smoke pouring from the side of the building which would not have been easily seen from the north side views.

No skyscraper has ever collapsed due to fire before, so having 3 collapse in 1 day seems a long coincidence. The debate over the heat of oil fires opposed to the melting point of steel was declared moot, however, when that overpass at the SF Bay/Oakland Bridge collapsed due solely to a gasoline tanker fire about 3 months ago. I would have to say it is possible those buildings were brought down by explosives, like so many believe, but it is not the only possible explanation.

The 9-11 Commission Report comes way short of explaining what happened that day. Eight of the eleven Commission members evidently believe the same because they have signed a petition to reopen the investigation, along with many other government & military experts. Sneak a peek at the link below.

http://www.patriotsquestion911.com/

2007-09-24 13:23:05 · answer #1 · answered by bob h 5 · 1 0

The steel structure and supports, involved in the initial impact, melted as a result of intense heat, and as one floor collapsed onto the next bottom floor, a chain reaction occurred. No floor could support the falling floors from above, causing all the floors to collapse, bringing down the walls with them.
The heat melting the steel at impact is why it took a few minutes after impact to collapse.

Those aircraft were loaded with 5,000, or more, pounds of fuel.

2007-09-24 10:29:01 · answer #2 · answered by ed 7 · 0 1

It had a great hollow in it and it become on hearth. i've got seen movies of the give way and that i've got seen movies of controlled demolition. there is not any assessment. "BBC suggested development 7 Had Collapsed 20 minutes earlier It Fell. How ought to that have befell?" The logical clarification is that a document that WTC 7 become broken have been given gone with the aid of numerous different agencies and throughout a technique of "chinese language whispers" grew to become "WTC 7 has collapsed". yet you probable do not prefer to pay attention logical motives. what's your option? that somebody on the secret 9/11 coordination centre suggested "hi, we are approximately to explode WTC 7, get me the telephone, I ought to call the BBC"? The development become in complete view of a million/2 the television cameras in great apple. Why the hell might they might desire to tell every physique it had fallen down?

2016-11-06 06:46:43 · answer #3 · answered by piano 4 · 0 0

I think debris from one of the other towers may have fallen onto tower 7 causing it to catch on fire which brought it down all together

2007-09-24 10:48:23 · answer #4 · answered by fresh_horses_7 5 · 2 0

It went straight down with the wieght of the upper floors above the point of impact coming down on the rest of the building.

2007-09-24 10:23:18 · answer #5 · answered by Ahwell 7 · 0 2

NO PLANE HIT TOWER 7!!!!!!! RESIDUAL FIRE FROM A BUILDING A BLOCK AWAY DOES NOT COLLAPSE A BUILDING!!!!!!!

2015-06-13 06:14:57 · answer #6 · answered by shane 1 · 0 0

plane hit it. caused structural damage.

2007-09-24 10:23:03 · answer #7 · answered by bob k 3 · 0 2

fedest.com, questions and answers