If he isn't a terrorist, then who the Heck is?!
The US military should take appropriate action while we have his whereabouts pinned down.
2007-09-24 09:27:31 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
This one is almost too easy, he came to us. No caves or mountains to treck through looking for him.
Now, let's do the right thing! And if the 'international community' doesn't like it they can go f*** themselves!
2007-09-24 09:35:20 · update #1
I answered a question earlier saying the exact same thing. We should arrest this guy and try him for war crimes against our soldiers.
Why does the world, including many of us here in the U.S., not inclined to defeat evil when we have the chance? Why are we so gutless? Why do we allow future Hitler's the time to develop weapons and armies bent on destroying the West?
2007-09-24 09:48:59 · answer #1 · answered by Matt 5 · 1⤊ 3⤋
No, he is not a terrorist. His predecessors
were. The Ayatollah Rullah Khomeini...
or President Rafsanjani would never have
been willing to come to the US on their own
accord and and address the United States.
(Rafsanjani might've--but did he ever offer
to? No.)
Iran doesn't like terrorism any more than
the US does. Nor does Iraq or Iran or even
Afghanistan.
I'll grant you, their governments might be a
bit lazier than most to devise strategies to
combat it.
But if the current president of Iran has some-
thing to say, then let him speak.
Why jump to the conclusion that he'll plant a
bomb, or something similar? That's neither
fair nor accurate: he's a human being; and
he's no friend of Osama bin Laden's. (If he
was, things could be INFINITELY WORSE
all around the world than they are now.)
Was it you, Dead Marxist, who gave my
answer a "thumbs down"? I would not be
at all surprised. Talk about "what's in a
name"... you must be very narrow-mined.
That's sad. Very sad.
2007-09-24 16:51:17 · answer #2 · answered by Pete K 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
He is the president of a sovereign state. He is attending a conference at the U.N. and is immune from arrest while here. He is an alleged terrorist, so there is no harboring going on and there is no military action that can eblegally taken.
2007-09-24 16:35:42 · answer #3 · answered by fangtaiyang 7 · 0⤊ 3⤋
Yet another reason to give the UN their eviction notice.
Try to imagine what this clown is costing the city of NY for security.
Try to imagine the repercussions if something happened to this twit?
It's not a reasonable risk for us to take. Let him use a teleconference next time. We have the technology.
2007-09-24 16:35:54 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
Sorry; he's a head of state, not a terrorist. Maybe he supports them; I won't argue that point. But we can't call another world leader a terrorist just because he's a giant nut bar.
2007-09-24 16:33:42 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 3⤋
Yes I agree. Bush should be arrested for allowing a terrorist onto our soil.
2007-09-24 16:35:42 · answer #6 · answered by mrlebowski99 6 · 1⤊ 3⤋
isn't listening to you harboring a terrorist?
If we accuse you of beign a terrorist, how long will it take for you to land in Gitmo with no rights whatsoever?
2007-09-24 16:34:34 · answer #7 · answered by me 3 · 1⤊ 2⤋
I totally agree...there should have been a squadron of Predator Drones dispatched to Columbia today.
2007-09-24 16:33:23 · answer #8 · answered by I Laugh At Morons 3 · 3⤊ 2⤋
He was invited by the UN and we cannot arrest someone who has diplomatic immunity.
2007-09-24 16:44:18 · answer #9 · answered by StephenWeinstein 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
And yet another reason for us to get the *&^# out of the UN.
2007-09-24 16:48:40 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋