2007-09-24 08:42:07 · 35 answers · asked by focus 6 in News & Events ➔ Other - News & Events
Actually although I'm sure it's tongue in cheek there will come a point where some unlucky so and so has to send them a letter saying that if she is no longer living with the family they have no right to child support.
Wouldn't like to have that job.
2007-09-24 08:46:12 · answer #1 · answered by snaffle 4 · 14⤊ 5⤋
A child is allowed to be out of the place of residence for up to but not beyond 42 days ie: hoilday or hospital, after which the parent/gaurdian may no longer claim, but im sure that is not an issue in this sad case.
2007-09-24 08:48:49 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 3⤋
I doubt it, but with McCanns Government connections &
a few Tycoons on the side, Parliament might bring a New
Rule.......Nothing seems impossible for those considered,
above "The Law Of The Land "......?
2007-09-24 08:55:21 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 3⤋
You ask a valid question, I don't know why everyone is upset by it.
I would think payments would be stopped until Madeleine is back home.
2007-09-24 14:36:16 · answer #4 · answered by Curious39 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Nope
2007-09-24 08:48:29 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 3⤋
Don't know how to answer that? Probably not they r the wrong colour & speak good English. (oh I'm just as bad.)
2007-09-24 08:51:44 · answer #6 · answered by A . Z . 3 · 5⤊ 1⤋
Why is this whole thing about money. Shouldn't it be about finding Madeleine???
2007-09-24 09:24:11 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I wouldn't think they have even given it a thought.
2007-09-24 09:52:01 · answer #8 · answered by ccea 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I dont think thatll be the first thing on their mind with a missing daughter.
2007-09-24 08:48:14 · answer #9 · answered by Perfectwings 3 · 9⤊ 3⤋
VERY out of focus
2007-09-24 08:57:00 · answer #10 · answered by koko l 3 · 2⤊ 1⤋