dont say none of them.
choose one and give good reasons why
2007-09-24 08:22:09 · 21 answers · asked by Mehran.S 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
A-Jad over Bush anyday.
He provided 3 very good points. the IAEA conducts round the clock inspections on Iranian's nuclear program, there are no gays in Iran (who wants gays), and he wants destruction of Israel....so do i. the Jews are the real criminals here. the genocide of Palestinians are largely ignored.
2007-09-24 08:27:23 · answer #1 · answered by Moore55 4 · 2⤊ 5⤋
HMMMMMM this such a very difficult decision.
Should i choose a man who restricts nearly all of my rights even down to what i see, hear, and read in all forms of media, who could imprison me at will, all the while forcing me to believe as he does. Or live as a subjagated servant.
Or, should i choose a man who is willing to go against the first man and say you WILL NOT take the freedoms of those who i lead! Who as a final resort will take force to keep the first from unleashing all sorts of evil upon those who cherish freedom. The freedom to say what you want, aswe allowed Ahmadinejad to do. Imagine the Iranians allowing Bush to talk at Tehran University. HEHE
OOps, guess I have to choose Bush!
2007-09-25 12:53:07 · answer #2 · answered by wayne 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
None. They're both bad for their countries and to all the rest.
What you want is to polarize the discussion of the issues. Draw a line, take one side and point fingers at the other. That's wrong.
Bush started a war, restricted his constituents civil liberties, ignored the Constitution, deteriorated the economy of his country and it's not getting any better.
Ahmadinejad is about the same but it's not invading countries on the other side of the world. At most, he's creating gunfights around the borders of his country.
I choose none but, if you see both from a global perspective, we'd be a lot better without Bush.
2007-09-24 15:46:52 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Bush, he doesn't have to have a brain to have beer with him(even if his is non-alcohol), joke around a little, and shoot a game of pool. Can't do "that" with the Persian guy.
2007-09-24 15:36:35 · answer #4 · answered by Rja 5 · 1⤊ 2⤋
bush.
he probably won't completely decimate this country as he has to live here when he's through with it.
that is, he has an interest in making sure at least parts of the country are working correctly.
ahmadinejad has no reason to care for what happens to america.
2007-09-24 15:26:39 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 2⤋
for president/leader = Bush
to kill = Ahmadinejad
2007-09-24 15:30:35 · answer #6 · answered by BravesWings 4 · 2⤊ 1⤋
I choose Bush and support him for his anti-terrorism, and I can't stand the way the libs are destroying our country.
2007-09-24 15:27:27 · answer #7 · answered by Sparkles 7 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Bush, perhaps an incompetent President but not a dictator..!
2007-09-24 15:27:20 · answer #8 · answered by dadacoolone 5 · 3⤊ 2⤋
Bush.
The initiator of the resistance to The Caliphate.
2007-09-24 15:26:20 · answer #9 · answered by Private Deek 2 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Bush and the reason why libs
2007-09-24 15:26:58 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 2⤋